Ferrari Portofino M
Car comparison
Ferrari Portofino M 3.9 V8vsJaguar F-type Convertible · Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Convertible · Facelift 2017
SVR 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari Portofino M 3.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Most powerful620 hp462 kW
- Highest torque760 Nm561 lb-ft
- Lightest1,545 kg3,406 lb
- Best power-to-weight401 hp/t299 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range708 km440 mi
- Largest trunk292 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score94/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 620hp462kW | 575hp429kW |
| Torque | 760Nm561lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,645kg3,627lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.0s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 51.6s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.8s | 10.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.1s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 401hp/t299kW/t182hp/1000 lb Calculated | 350hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 492Nm/t329lb-ft/ton Calculated | 426Nm/t285lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 642km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,855cc235cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,594mm181in | 4,482mm176in |
| Width | 1,938mm76in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,318mm52in | 1,308mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | 1,633mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,635mm64in | 1,627mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 292L | 207L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 249g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari Portofino M 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | 5,750-7,500 rpm | 3,000-5,750 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.8 s | 10.4 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 44.8 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.4 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.1 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 214 km/h 133 mph | 210 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | 620 hp 462 kW |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW |
Ferrari Portofino M 3.9 V8 has 45 hp more than Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 and Ferrari Portofino M 3.9 V8: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 314 km/h 195 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | 3.5 s |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari Portofino M 3.9 V8 and Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | 401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | 708 km 440 mi |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 642 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | 620 hp 462 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW | 3.7 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari Portofino M 3.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | 401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariPortofino M3.9 V8 | JaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 620 hp 462 kW | 575 hp 429 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | 314 km/h 195 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 642 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 249 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 292 L 10.3 cu ft | 207 L 7.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Portofino M 3.9 V8 | Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.78 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,966 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari Portofino M 3.9 V8
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 52 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 66 km (41 mi) more estimated range
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Jaguar F-type Convertible Facelift 2017 SVR 5.0 V8
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























