Ferrari 456
Car comparison
Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12vsMercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CL (C215)
AMG CL 63 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12
- Most powerful444 hp331 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption22.2 L/100 km10.6 mpg US12.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range624 km388 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score54/100
Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed298 km/h185 mph
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight250 hp/t186 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 442hp330kW | 444hp331kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 85.0s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.1s Calculated | 18.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 29.8L/100 km7.9mpg US9.5mpg UK | 22.2L/100 km10.6mpg US12.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 250hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 236hp/t176kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 611km380mi Calculated | 624km388mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,474cc334cu in | 6,258cc382cu in |
| Length | 4,730mm186in | 4,993mm197in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,398mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,885mm114in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,577mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,578mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 316L | 450L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 110L | 88L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 5,500 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.1 s | 18.9 s |
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 442 hp 330 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 444 hp 331 kW |
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12 has 2 hp more than Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12 and Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 5.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 5.5 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12 has more power, Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12 and Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 250 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 611 km 380 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 624 km 388 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 442 hp 330 kW | 5.5 s | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 444 hp 331 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 |
| 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 250 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | Mercedes-BenzCL (C215)AMG CL 63 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 442 hp 330 kW | 444 hp 331 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 298 km/h 185 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 611 km 380 mi | 624 km 388 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 316 L 11.2 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 250 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 236 hp/t 176 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12 | Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 18 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.7 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 31.50 LC100 km | 24.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 50.69 LC100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,700 L713 US gal594 UK gal | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,725 LC/year | 3,701 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CL (C215) AMG CL 63 V12
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 km (8 mi) more estimated range
- Has 134 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























