Ferrari 575M Maranello
Car comparison
Ferrari 575M Maranello 575vsFerrari 360 Modena 360 F1
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 360 Modena
360 F1
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari 575M Maranello 575
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph Unrestricted325 km/h202 mph Restricted
- Most powerful515 hp384 kW
- Highest torque588 Nm434 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight298 hp/t222 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best practicality score34/100
Ferrari 360 Modena 360 F1
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption17.9 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption28.0 L/100 km8.4 mpg US10.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range531 km330 mi
- Largest trunk220 L
- Best economy score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari575M Maranello575 | Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 515hp384kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 588Nm434lb-ft | 373Nm275lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 61.4s99% target: 293 km/h / 182 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.8s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 21.8L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 34.5L/100 km6.8mpg US8.2mpg UK | 28L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.0s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 298hp/t222kW/t135hp/1000 lb Calculated | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 340Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 523km325mi Calculated | 531km330mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,748cc351cu in | 3,586cc219cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,477mm176in |
| Width | 1,935mm76in | 1,922mm76in |
| Height | 1,277mm50in | 1,214mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,500mm98in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,632mm64in | 1,669mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | 1,617mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 220L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 114L | 95L |
| CO2 emissions | 499g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 575M Maranello 575: Power / Torque
- Ferrari 360 Modena 360 F1: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 7,250 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 8,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari575M Maranello575 | Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.8 s | 13.4 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 47.6 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited | 296 km/h 184 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.0 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 202 km/h 125 mph | 193 km/h 120 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 515 hp 384 kW |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Ferrari 575M Maranello 575 has 115 hp more than Ferrari 360 Modena 360 F1.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 360 Modena 360 F1 and Ferrari 575M Maranello 575: 115 hp (86 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 296 km/h 184 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 4.2 s |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari 575M Maranello 575 and Ferrari 360 Modena 360 F1: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 17.9 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari 360 Modena 360 F1 and Ferrari 575M Maranello 575: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 298 hp/t 222 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 523 km 325 mi |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 531 km 330 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 515 hp 384 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.5 s | 296 km/h 184 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 |
| 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 |
| 17.9 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari 360 Modena 360 F1 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 17.9 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.8 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari575M Maranello575 | 298 hp/t 222 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK |
| Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 17.9 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari575M Maranello575 | Ferrari360 Modena360 F1 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 515 hp 384 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | 296 km/h 184 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK | 17.9 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 523 km 325 mi | 531 km 330 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 499 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 298 hp/t 222 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 575M Maranello 575 | Ferrari 360 Modena 360 F1 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 21.8 L/100 km10.8 mpg US13 mpg UK | 17.9 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 38.15 LC100 km | 31.32 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 61.40 LC100 mi | 50.41 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,270 L864 US gal719 UK gal | 2,685 L709 US gal591 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,723 LC/year | 4,699 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 575M Maranello 575
- Has 115 hp more
- Has 215 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 39 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ferrari 360 Modena 360 F1
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























