Ferrari 348 TS
Car comparison
Ferrari 348 TS 3.4 V8vsFerrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari Testarossa
4.9 i V12 48V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Most powerful380 hp283 kW
- Highest torque474 Nm350 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight224 hp/t167 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,009 km627 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score76/100
Ferrari 348 TS 3.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,393 kg3,071 lb
- Lowest city consumption19.6 L/100 km12.0 mpg US14.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Best practicality score38/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 380hp283kW |
| Torque | 324Nm239lb-ft | 474Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,393kg3,071lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Gross weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.7s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 86.9s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.5s Calculated | 18.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 215hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 224hp/t167kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 279Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 760km472mi Calculated | 1,009km627mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,405cc208cu in | 4,942cc302cu in |
| Length | 4,230mm167in | 4,485mm177in |
| Width | 1,894mm75in | 1,975mm78in |
| Height | 1,170mm46in | 1,130mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,550mm100in |
| Front track | 1,502mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,660mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 200L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 95L | 115L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 348 TS 3.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | 7,200 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 5,750 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.5 s | 18.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 380 hp 283 kW |
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V has 80 hp more than Ferrari 348 TS 3.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 348 TS 3.4 V8 and Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: 80 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 474 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | 1,393 kg 3,071 lb |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | 5.6 s |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 5.7 s |
Although Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V has more power, Ferrari 348 TS 3.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari 348 TS 3.4 V8 and Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 348 TS 3.4 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | 760 km 472 mi |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 1,009 km 627 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.7 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari348 TS3.4 V8 | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 380 hp 283 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft | 474 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,393 kg 3,071 lb | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 760 km 472 mi | 1,009 km 627 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 224 hp/t 167 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 348 TS 3.4 V8 | Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.88 LC100 km | 19.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,281 LC/year | 2,993 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 348 TS 3.4 V8
- Is 307 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Has 80 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 249 km (155 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























