Ferrari 348 Spider
Car comparison
Ferrari 348 Spider 3.4 V8vsPorsche Boxster (981) S 3.4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche Boxster (981)
S 3.4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.1 s
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range711 km442 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Ferrari 348 Spider 3.4 V8
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 315hp235kW |
| Torque | 324Nm239lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,370kg3,020lb | 1,340kg2,954lb |
| Gross weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 279 km/h 173 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.0s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 66.4s99% target: 276 km/h / 172 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.6s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 693km431mi Calculated | 711km442mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,405cc208cu in | 3,436cc210cu in |
| Length | 4,230mm167in | 4,374mm172in |
| Width | 1,894mm75in | 1,801mm71in |
| Height | 1,170mm46in | 1,281mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,475mm97in |
| Front track | 1,502mm59in | - |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 200L | 280L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 88L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 348 Spider 3.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | 7,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 6,700 rpm | 4,500-5,800 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.6 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 279 km/h 173 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 315 hp 235 kW |
Ferrari 348 Spider 3.4 V8 has 5 hp more than Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 and Ferrari 348 Spider 3.4 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 279 km/h 173 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | 5.4 s |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 5.1 s |
Although Ferrari 348 Spider 3.4 V8 has more power, Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 and Ferrari 348 Spider 3.4 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 and Ferrari 348 Spider 3.4 V8: 3.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | 693 km 431 mi |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 711 km 442 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 315 hp 235 kW | 5.1 s | 279 km/h 173 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 5.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari348 Spider3.4 V8 | PorscheBoxster (981)S 3.4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 315 hp 235 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 279 km/h 173 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,370 kg 3,020 lb | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 693 km 431 mi | 711 km 442 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 348 Spider 3.4 V8 | Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.22 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,334 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 348 Spider 3.4 V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche Boxster (981) S 3.4
- Has 36 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























