Lamborghini Huracan EVO · Facelift 2019
Car comparison
Lamborghini Huracan EVO · Facelift 2019 5.2 V10vsFerrari 296 GTB 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 296 GTB
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari 296 GTB 3.0 V6
- Most powerful663 hp494 kW
- Highest torque740 Nm546 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight451 hp/t336 kW/t2.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,016 km631 mi
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score96/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Fastest top speed340 km/h211 mph Unrestricted325 km/h202 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,422 kg3,135 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 640hp477kW | 663hp494kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 740Nm546lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,422kg3,135lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.1s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated | 34.6s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.0s | 7.3s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.7L/100 km17.2mpg US20.6mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.6s Calculated | 10.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 450hp/t336kW/t204hp/1000 lb Calculated | 451hp/t336kW/t205hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated | 503Nm/t337lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 606km376mi Calculated | 1,016km631mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,204cc318cu in | 2,992cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,565mm180in |
| Width | 1,933mm76in | 1,958mm77in |
| Height | 1,165mm46in | 1,187mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,620mm103in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | 1,665mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,620mm64in | 1,632mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 122mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 100L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10: Power / Torque
- Ferrari 296 GTB 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 8,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,700 rpm |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 8,000 rpm | 3,250 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.0 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 38.3 s | 28.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.6 s | 10.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 217 km/h 135 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 640 hp 477 kW |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 663 hp 494 kW |
Ferrari 296 GTB 3.0 V6 has 23 hp more than Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10.
The biggest power difference is between Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10 and Ferrari 296 GTB 3.0 V6: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 2.9 s |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 2.9 s |
Although Ferrari 296 GTB 3.0 V6 has more power, Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari 296 GTB 3.0 V6 and Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10: 7.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 450 hp/t 336 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 451 hp/t 336 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 606 km 376 mi |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 1,016 km 631 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 640 hp 477 kW | 2.9 s | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 663 hp 494 kW | 2.9 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 |
| 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari 296 GTB 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | 450 hp/t 336 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK |
| Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | 451 hp/t 336 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniHuracan EVOFacelift 20195.2 V10 | Ferrari296 GTB3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 640 hp 477 kW | 663 hp 494 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 740 Nm 546 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 340 km/h211 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,422 kg 3,135 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.7 L/100 km 17.2 mpg US 20.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 606 km 376 mi | 1,016 km 631 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 100 L 3.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 450 hp/t 336 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | 451 hp/t 336 kW/t 2.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10 | Ferrari 296 GTB 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.7 L/100 km17.2 mpg US20.6 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 23.97 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.58 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,055 L543 US gal452 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,596 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Huracan EVO Facelift 2019 5.2 V10
- Is 48 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ferrari 296 GTB 3.0 V6
- Has 23 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Uses 7.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 410 km (255 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























