Engler F.F SUPERQUAD
Car comparison
Engler F.F SUPERQUAD 5.2 V10vsMcLaren Senna 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMcLaren Senna
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Engler F.F SUPERQUAD 5.2 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.5 s
- Fastest top speed350 km/h217 mph
- Most powerful850 hp634 kW
- Lightest850 kg1,874 lb
- Best power-to-weight1,000 hp/t746 kW/t1.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score98/100
McLaren Senna 4.0 V8
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | EnglerF.F SUPERQUAD5.2 V10 | McLarenSenna4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 850hp634kW | 800hp597kW |
| Torque | - | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 850kg1,874lb | 1,198kg2,641lb |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 30.9s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated | 31.4s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.5s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 6.1s Calculated | 6.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.4s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 9.4s Calculated | 9.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 1,000hp/t746kW/t454hp/1000 lb Calculated | 668hp/t498kW/t303hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | - | 668Nm/t447lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,670mm184in | 4,744mm187in |
| Width | 1,950mm77in | 2,153mm85in |
| Height | 950mm37in | 1,195mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | - |
| Doors | - | 2 |
| Seats | 1 | 2 |
| CO2 emissions | - | 280g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | EnglerF.F SUPERQUAD5.2 V10 | McLarenSenna4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.5 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 6.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 17.3 s | 22.5 s |
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.3 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.0 s | 8.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 258 km/h 160 mph | 248 km/h 154 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| EnglerF.F SUPERQUAD5.2 V10 | 850 hp 634 kW |
| McLarenSenna4.0 V8 | 800 hp 597 kW |
Engler F.F SUPERQUAD 5.2 V10 has 50 hp more than McLaren Senna 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between McLaren Senna 4.0 V8 and Engler F.F SUPERQUAD 5.2 V10: 50 hp (37 kW).
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| EnglerF.F SUPERQUAD5.2 V10 | 850 kg 1,874 lb |
| McLarenSenna4.0 V8 | 1,198 kg 2,641 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| EnglerF.F SUPERQUAD5.2 V10 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| McLarenSenna4.0 V8 | 335 km/h 208 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| EnglerF.F SUPERQUAD5.2 V10 | 2.5 s |
| McLarenSenna4.0 V8 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Engler F.F SUPERQUAD 5.2 V10 and McLaren Senna 4.0 V8: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| EnglerF.F SUPERQUAD5.2 V10 | 1,000 hp/t 746 kW/t 1.0 kg/hp |
| McLarenSenna4.0 V8 | 668 hp/t 498 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| EnglerF.F SUPERQUAD5.2 V10 | 850 hp 634 kW | 2.5 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| McLarenSenna4.0 V8 | 800 hp 597 kW | 2.8 s | 335 km/h 208 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EnglerF.F SUPERQUAD5.2 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| McLarenSenna4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | EnglerF.F SUPERQUAD5.2 V10 | McLarenSenna4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 850 hp 634 kW | 800 hp 597 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | - | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.5 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 350 km/h 217 mph | 335 km/h 208 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 850 kg 1,874 lb | 1,198 kg 2,641 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 280 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 1,000 hp/t 746 kW/t 1.0 kg/hp | 668 hp/t 498 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | McLaren Senna 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Engler F.F SUPERQUAD 5.2 V10
- Has 50 hp more
- Is 348 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 332 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
McLaren Senna 4.0 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























