Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) · Facelift 2020 E 200vsDS 9 1.6 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDS 9
1.6 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 9 1.6 PureTech
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,053 km654 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | DS91.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197hp147kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 2,360kg5,203lb | 2,075kg4,575lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 72.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.5s Calculated | 28.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 725km450mi Calculated | 1,053km654mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,935mm194in | 4,934mm194in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,932mm76in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,895mm114in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,608mm63in | 1,566mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 158g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200: Power / Torque
- DS 9 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,650-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,900 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | DS91.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.5 s | 28.8 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 197 hp 147 kW |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW |
DS 9 1.6 PureTech has 28 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200 and DS 9 1.6 PureTech: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 7.5 s |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 8.1 s |
Although DS 9 1.6 PureTech has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200 and DS 9 1.6 PureTech: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 9 1.6 PureTech and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 725 km 450 mi |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 1,053 km 654 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 197 hp 147 kW | 7.5 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW | 8.1 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DS91.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| DS91.6 PureTech |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| DS91.6 PureTech | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020E 200 | DS91.6 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp 147 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 725 km 450 mi | 1,053 km 654 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 158 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200 | DS 9 1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) Facelift 2020 E 200
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
DS 9 1.6 PureTech
- Has 28 hp more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 328 km (204 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























