Car comparison

DS 9 1.6 PureTechvsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
225 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2020-2022
VS

Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020

2.0d

204 hp1997 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

DS 9 1.6 PureTech

  • Fastest top speed
    236 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    225 hp
    168 kW
  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Best estimated range
    1,053 km
    654 mi
  • Largest trunk
    510 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelDS91.6 PureTechJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
225hp168kW
204hp152kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,647kg3,631lb
Gross weight
2,075kg4,575lb
-
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
72.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
67.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
28.8s
Calculated
26.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,053km654mi
Calculated
1,037km644mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,934mm194in
4,678mm184in
Width
1,932mm76in
1,967mm77in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,410mm56in
Wheelbase
2,895mm114in
2,835mm112in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,566mm62in
1,608mm63in
Trunk volume
510L
356L
Max trunk volume-
1,236L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
56L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

DS 9 1.6 PureTechJaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0dPowerTorque
  • DS 9 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
DS91.6 PureTech5,500 rpm1,900 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d4,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,500 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricDS91.6 PureTechJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.8 s
26.7 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS91.6 PureTech
225 hp
168 kW
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW

DS 9 1.6 PureTech has 21 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d and DS 9 1.6 PureTech: 21 hp (16 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS91.6 PureTech
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS91.6 PureTech
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
1,647 kg
3,631 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS91.6 PureTech
236 km/h
147 mph
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS91.6 PureTech8.1 s
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d7.3 s

Although DS 9 1.6 PureTech has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d and DS 9 1.6 PureTech: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS91.6 PureTech
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS91.6 PureTech
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS91.6 PureTech
1,053 km
654 mi
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
1,037 km
644 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
DS91.6 PureTech
225 hp
168 kW
8.1 s
236 km/h
147 mph
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
204 hp
152 kW
7.3 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
DS91.6 PureTech
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,934 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
356 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,678 mm
184.2 in
Height
1,410 mm
55.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
DS91.6 PureTech
Power
225 hp
168 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
DS91.6 PureTech
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
8.1 s
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
DS91.6 PureTech
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleDS91.6 PureTechJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d
Power
225 hp
168 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
7.3 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,647 kg
3,631 lb
Fuel consumption
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,934 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
356 L
12.6 cu ft
Length
4,678 mm
184.2 in
Height
1,410 mm
55.5 in
Range score
1,053 km
654 mi
1,037 km
644 mi
Trunk score
510 L
18.0 cu ft
356 L
12.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleDS 9 1.6 PureTechJaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d
Consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.98 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.05 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used855 L226 US gal188 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,496 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

DS 9 1.6 PureTech

  • Has 21 hp more
  • Is 107 kg lighter
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 154 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
DS 9 1.6 PureTech
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

DS 9 1.6 PureTech vs Jaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster