Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 250vsDS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDS 7 Crossback
1.6 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score55/100
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption2.2 L/100 km106.9 mpg US128.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk555 L
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,430kg3,153lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 73.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.2s Calculated | 33.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 2.2L/100 km106.9mpg US128.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 164Nm/t110lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 848km527mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,424mm174in | 4,573mm180in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,906mm75in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,699mm106in | 2,738mm108in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 421L | 555L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,235L | 628L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | - |
| CO2 emissions | - | 128g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: Power / Torque
- DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.2 s | 33.7 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 200 hp 149 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 has 11 hp more than DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.6 s |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 6.5 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 has more power, DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 2.2 L/100 km 106.9 mpg US 128.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250: 4.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.6 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.5 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
| 2.2 L/100 km 106.9 mpg US 128.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 2.2 L/100 km 106.9 mpg US 128.4 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 2.2 L/100 km 106.9 mpg US 128.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | 1,825 kg 4,023 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 2.2 L/100 km 106.9 mpg US 128.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 848 km 527 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 128 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 421 L 14.9 cu ft | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250 | DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 2.2 L/100 km106.9 mpg US128.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 3.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 6.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 330 L87 US gal73 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 577.50 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 250
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 395 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 134 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























