Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250vsDS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDS 7 Crossback
1.6 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Lightest1,428 kg3,148 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t117 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,127 km700 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,670kg3,682lb | 1,428kg3,148lb |
| Gross weight | 2,205kg4,861lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.3s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 89.6s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.7s Calculated | 33.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 811km504mi Calculated | 1,127km700mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 4,573mm180in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,906mm75in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,738mm108in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,621mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,598mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 190mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 555L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,805L | 1,752L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250: Power / Torque
- DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 5,800 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,900 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.7 s | 33.5 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW |
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech has 1 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250 and DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,428 kg 3,148 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 6.9 s |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 8.2 s |
Although DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250 and DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 811 km 504 mi |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,127 km 700 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.9 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW | 8.2 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,670 kg 3,682 lb | 1,428 kg 3,148 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 811 km 504 mi | 1,127 km 700 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250 | DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 250
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 242 kg lighter
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 316 km (197 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























