McLaren 750S Spider
Car comparison
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8vsDonkervoort D8 GTO GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDonkervoort D8 GTO
GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.6 s
- Lightest680 kg1,499 lb
- Best power-to-weight640 hp/t477 kW/t1.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range600 km373 mi
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score28/100
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8
- Fastest top speed332 km/h206 mph
- Most powerful750 hp559 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 750hp559kW | 435hp324kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,438kg3,170lb | 680kg1,499lb |
| Top speed | 332 km/h 206 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 37.3s99% target: 329 km/h / 204 mph Calculated | 31.9s99% target: 283 km/h / 176 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 2.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.3s | 7.7s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 2.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.0s Calculated | 10.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 522hp/t389kW/t237hp/1000 lb Calculated | 640hp/t477kW/t290hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 556Nm/t372lb-ft/ton Calculated | 824Nm/t551lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 590km367mi Calculated | 600km373mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,994cc244cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,569mm180in | 3,836mm151in |
| Width | 1,930mm76in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,196mm47in | 1,081mm43in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,350mm93in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 58L | 250L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 48L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 5,850-7,000 rpm | 1,750-6,350 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 28.1 s | - |
| Top speed | 332 km/h 206 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.0 s | 10.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 238 km/h 148 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 750 hp 559 kW |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 435 hp 324 kW |
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 has 315 hp more than Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI and McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8: 315 hp (235 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 1,438 kg 3,170 lb |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 680 kg 1,499 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 332 km/h 206 mph |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 286 km/h 178 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 2.8 s |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 2.6 s |
Although McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 has more power, Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI and McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI and McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 522 hp/t 389 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 640 hp/t 477 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 590 km 367 mi |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 600 km 373 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 750 hp 559 kW | 2.8 s | 332 km/h 206 mph |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 435 hp 324 kW | 2.6 s | 286 km/h 178 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 2.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | 522 hp/t 389 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | 640 hp/t 477 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | McLaren750S Spider4.0 V8 | DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 750 hp 559 kW | 435 hp 324 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 2.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 332 km/h 206 mph | 286 km/h 178 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,438 kg 3,170 lb | 680 kg 1,499 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 590 km 367 mi | 600 km 373 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 58 L 2.0 cu ft | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 522 hp/t 389 kW/t 1.9 kg/hp | 640 hp/t 477 kW/t 1.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8 | Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
McLaren 750S Spider 4.0 V8
- Has 315 hp more
- Has 240 Nm more
- Has 46 km/h (29 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO Invdividual Series 2.5 TFSI
- Is 758 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 118 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 km (6 mi) more estimated range
- Has 192 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























