Donkervoort D8 GTO
Car comparison
Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-40 2.5 TFSIvsMercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R232)
AMG SL 43
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-40 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful386 hp288 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest678 kg1,495 lb
- Best power-to-weight569 hp/t425 kW/t1.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score86/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range745 km463 mi
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 386hp288kW | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 678kg1,495lb | 1,810kg3,990lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,145kg4,729lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 34.7s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.7s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.7s | 16.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.6s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.1s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 569hp/t425kW/t258hp/1000 lb Calculated | 210hp/t157kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 737Nm/t493lb-ft/ton Calculated | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 480km298mi Calculated | 745km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,836mm151in | 4,705mm185in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,915mm75in |
| Height | 1,081mm43in | 1,359mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,350mm93in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,665mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,629mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 213L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 240L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 178g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-40 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 6,750 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.6 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.7 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.7 s | 16.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.6 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.5 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.1 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 228 km/h 142 mph | 181 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | 386 hp 288 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 381 hp 284 kW |
Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-40 2.5 TFSI has 5 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43 and Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-40 2.5 TFSI: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | 678 kg 1,495 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | 2.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-40 2.5 TFSI and Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43: 2.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43 and Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-40 2.5 TFSI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | 569 hp/t 425 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | 480 km 298 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 745 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | 386 hp 288 kW | 2.7 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 381 hp 284 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-40 2.5 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 2.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | 569 hp/t 425 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | DonkervoortD8 GTOGTO-40 2.5 TFSI | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 386 hp 288 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.7 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 678 kg 1,495 lb | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 480 km 298 mi | 745 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 178 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 213 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 569 hp/t 425 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-40 2.5 TFSI | Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Donkervoort D8 GTO GTO-40 2.5 TFSI
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 1,132 kg lighter
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 359 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 37 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 265 km (164 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























