Ferrari GTC4Lusso
Car comparison
Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12vsDodge Viper VX SRT 8.4i V10 20V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDodge Viper VX
SRT 8.4i V10 20V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph
- Most powerful690 hp515 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range607 km377 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score57/100
Dodge Viper VX SRT 8.4i V10 20V
- Highest torque814 Nm600 lb-ft
- Lightest1,521 kg3,353 lb
- Best power-to-weight427 hp/t318 kW/t2.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 690hp515kW | 649hp484kW |
| Torque | 697Nm514lb-ft | 814Nm600lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,790kg3,946lb | 1,521kg3,353lb |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.2s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 57.0s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.3s Calculated | 10.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 385hp/t287kW/t175hp/1000 lb Calculated | 427hp/t318kW/t194hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 389Nm/t261lb-ft/ton Calculated | 535Nm/t358lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 607km377mi Calculated | 417km259mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,262cc382cu in | 8,382cc512cu in |
| Length | 4,922mm194in | 4,463mm176in |
| Width | 1,980mm78in | 1,941mm76in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,246mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,990mm118in | 2,510mm99in |
| Front track | 1,674mm66in | 1,598mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,668mm66in | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 114L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 91L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 350g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12: Power / Torque
- Dodge Viper VX SRT 8.4i V10 20V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 8,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm | 8,250 rpm |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | 6,200 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.3 s | 10.4 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 35.9 s | 39.4 s |
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 219 km/h 136 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 690 hp 515 kW |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | 649 hp 484 kW |
Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12 has 41 hp more than Dodge Viper VX SRT 8.4i V10 20V.
The biggest power difference is between Dodge Viper VX SRT 8.4i V10 20V and Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 697 Nm 514 lb-ft |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | 814 Nm 600 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 3.4 s |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12 and Dodge Viper VX SRT 8.4i V10 20V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12 and Dodge Viper VX SRT 8.4i V10 20V: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 385 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | 427 hp/t 318 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 607 km 377 mi |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | 417 km 259 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 690 hp 515 kW | 3.4 s | 335 km/h 208 mph |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | 649 hp 484 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V |
| 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | 385 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
| DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | 427 hp/t 318 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariGTC4Lusso6.3 V12 | DodgeViper VXSRT 8.4i V10 20V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 690 hp 515 kW | 649 hp 484 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 697 Nm 514 lb-ft | 814 Nm 600 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 335 km/h 208 mph | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | 1,521 kg 3,353 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 16.8 L/100 km 14.0 mpg US 16.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 607 km 377 mi | 417 km 259 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 350 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 114 L 4.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 385 hp/t 287 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 427 hp/t 318 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12 | Dodge Viper VX SRT 8.4i V10 20V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK | 16.8 L/100 km14 mpg US16.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.25 LC100 km | 29.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi | 47.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal | 2,520 L666 US gal554 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,938 LC/year | 4,410 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari GTC4Lusso 6.3 V12
- Has 41 hp more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 190 km (118 mi) more estimated range
- Has 336 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Dodge Viper VX SRT 8.4i V10 20V
- Has 117 Nm more
- Is 269 kg lighter
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























