Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8vsDavid Brown Speedback GT 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDavid Brown Speedback GT
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Lightest1,645 kg3,627 lb
- Best power-to-weight310 hp/t231 kW/t3.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions224 g/km
- Best estimated range677 km421 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Gross weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 2,129kg4,694lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.4s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 62.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 310hp/t231kW/t141hp/1000 lb Calculated | 266hp/t198kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 395Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 677km421mi Calculated | 577km359mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,546mm179in | 4,760mm187in |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,288mm51in | 1,350mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,630mm104in | 2,750mm108in |
| Front track | 1,680mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 98mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 243L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 502L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 224g/km | 292g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- David Brown Speedback GT 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 1,750-4,750 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 16.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 207 km/h 128 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 3.8 s |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 and David Brown Speedback GT 5.0 V8: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 and David Brown Speedback GT 5.0 V8: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 310 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 677 km 421 mi |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | 577 km 359 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | 310 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)S 4.0 V8 | David BrownSpeedback GT5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 677 km 421 mi | 577 km 359 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 224 g/km | 292 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 243 L 8.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 310 hp/t 231 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8 | David Brown Speedback GT 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) S 4.0 V8
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 275 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 55 km/h (34 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 100 km (62 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 68 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
David Brown Speedback GT 5.0 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























