Cupra Leon Sportstourer
Car comparison
Cupra Leon Sportstourer 1.5 eTSIvsMercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118)
CLA 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Leon Sportstourer 1.5 eTSI
- Fastest top speed216 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,341 kg2,956 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t83 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,341kg2,956lb | 1,555kg3,428lb |
| Gross weight | 1,980kg4,365lb | 2,185kg4,817lb |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.4s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 70.9s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.4s Calculated | 82.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 96hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 726km451mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,950cc119cu in |
| Length | 4,657mm183in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,799mm71in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,683mm106in | 2,729mm107in |
| Front track | 1,554mm61in | 1,612mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,602mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 104mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 495L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,360L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Leon Sportstourer 1.5 eTSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | - | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 3,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.4 s | 82.8 s |
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 1,341 kg 2,956 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 201 km/h 125 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 8.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d and Cupra Leon Sportstourer 1.5 eTSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d and Cupra Leon Sportstourer 1.5 eTSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 726 km 451 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraLeon Sportstourer1.5 eTSI | Mercedes-BenzCLA Shooting Brake (X118)CLA 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 216 km/h 134 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,341 kg 2,956 lb | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 726 km 451 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 495 L 17.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 96 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Leon Sportstourer 1.5 eTSI | Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 8.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,339 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Leon Sportstourer 1.5 eTSI
- Is 214 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz CLA Shooting Brake (X118) CLA 200d
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 274 km (170 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























