Car comparison

Ferrari 296 GTS 3.0 V6vsCupra E-Racer 65.6 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ferrari 296 GTS

3.0 V6

663 hp2992 ccHybridRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2022-present
VS

Cupra E-Racer

65.6 kWh

680 hpElectricRWDAutomaticCoupe2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari 296 GTS 3.0 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    330 km/h
    205 mph
  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    431 hp/t
    321 kW/t
    2.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    95/100
  • Best economy score
    0/100

Cupra E-Racer 65.6 kWh

  • Most powerful
    680 hp
    507 kW
  • Highest torque
    960 Nm
    708 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    45/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFerrari296 GTS3.0 V6CupraE-Racer65.6 kWh
Power
663hp494kW
680hp507kW
Torque
740Nm546lb-ft
960Nm708lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,750kg3,858lb
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
272 km/h
169 mph
To 99% top speed
38.6s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph
Calculated
35.2s99% target: 269 km/h / 167 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.9s
3.2s
0-200 km/h
7.6s
9.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.8s
Calculated
3.1s
Calculated
Quarter mile
10.2s
Calculated
10.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
431hp/t321kW/t195hp/1000 lb
Calculated
389hp/t290kW/t176hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
481Nm/t322lb-ft/ton
Calculated
549Nm/t367lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Displacement
2,992cc183cu in
-
Length
4,565mm180in
4,671mm184in
Width
1,958mm77in
1,950mm77in
Height
1,191mm47in
-
Wheelbase
2,600mm102in
-
Front track
1,665mm66in
-
Rear track
1,632mm64in
-
Trunk volume
49L
-
Doors
2
5
Seats
2
1
Fuel tank
65L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFerrari296 GTS3.0 V6CupraE-Racer65.6 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.8 s
3.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.9 s
3.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.6 s
9.7 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
30.9 s
-
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
272 km/h
169 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.6 s
4.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.8 s
7.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.6 s
9.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.2 s
10.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
235 km/h
146 mph
211 km/h
131 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6
663 hp
494 kW
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWh
680 hp
507 kW

Cupra E-Racer 65.6 kWh has 17 hp more than Ferrari 296 GTS 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 296 GTS 3.0 V6 and Cupra E-Racer 65.6 kWh: 17 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWh
960 Nm
708 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWh
1,750 kg
3,858 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6
330 km/h
205 mph
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWh
272 km/h
169 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V62.9 s
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWh3.2 s

Although Cupra E-Racer 65.6 kWh has more power, Ferrari 296 GTS 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari 296 GTS 3.0 V6 and Cupra E-Racer 65.6 kWh: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6
431 hp/t
321 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWh
389 hp/t
290 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6
663 hp
494 kW
2.9 s
330 km/h
205 mph
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWh
680 hp
507 kW
3.2 s
272 km/h
169 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6
Power
663 hp
494 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
49 L
1.7 cu ft
Length
4,565 mm
179.7 in
Height
1,191 mm
46.9 in
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWh
Power
680 hp
507 kW
0-100 km/h3.2 s
Top speed
272 km/h
169 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
1 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height-

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFerrari296 GTS3.0 V6CupraE-Racer65.6 kWh
Power
663 hp
494 kW
680 hp
507 kW
Torque
740 Nm
546 lb-ft
960 Nm
708 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.9 s
3.2 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
272 km/h
169 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,750 kg
3,858 lb
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
49 L
1.7 cu ft
Length
4,565 mm
179.7 in
Height
1,191 mm
46.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
1 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height-
Trunk score
49 L
1.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
431 hp/t
321 kW/t
2.3 kg/hp
389 hp/t
290 kW/t
2.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari 296 GTS 3.0 V6

  • Is 210 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 58 km/h (36 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 42 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Cupra E-Racer 65.6 kWh

  • Has 17 hp more
  • Has 220 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ferrari 296 GTS 3.0 V6
Cupra E-Racer 65.6 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6
3.0 V6
VS
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6vsFerrari296 GTB3.0 V6
65.6 kWh
3.9 V8
VS
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWhvsFerrariRoma3.9 V8
3.0 V6
3.9 V8
VS
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6vsFerrariF8 Tributo3.9 V8
65.6 kWh
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWhvsBMWM8 Coupe (F92)Competition 4.4 V8
65.6 kWh
5.2 V12
VS
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWhvsAston MartinV12 Vantage5.2 V12
3.0 V6
3.9 V8
VS
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6vsFerrariF8 Spider3.9 V8
65.6 kWh
3.0 V6
VS
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWhvsMaseratiMC203.0 V6
3.0 V6
3.9 V8
VS
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6vsFerrari488 GTB3.9 V8
65.6 kWh
Competition 4.4 V8
VS
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWhvsBMWM8 Gran Coupe (F93)Competition 4.4 V8
3.0 V6
3.9 V8
VS
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6vsFerrari488 Spider3.9 V8
65.6 kWh
4.0 V8
VS
CupraE-Racer65.6 kWhvsMcLarenGT4.0 V8
3.0 V6
4.0 V8
VS
Ferrari296 GTS3.0 V6vsFerrariSF90 Stradale4.0 V8
Ferrari 296 GTS 3.0 V6 vs Cupra E-Racer 65.6 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster