Chrysler Viper RT/10
Car comparison
Chrysler Viper RT/10 8.0 V10vsMercedes-Benz S-class (W140) S 600 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz S-class (W140)
S 600 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chrysler Viper RT/10 8.0 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed266 km/h165 mph
- Most powerful394 hp294 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Best power-to-weight247 hp/t184 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score69/100
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) S 600 V12
- Best estimated range649 km403 mi
- Largest trunk525 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 394hp294kW | 394hp294kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 570Nm420lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Gross weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 2,710kg5,975lb |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.4s99% target: 263 km/h / 164 mph Calculated | 68.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.6s Calculated | 20.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 20.7L/100 km11.4mpg US13.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 247hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 181hp/t135kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 389Nm/t260lb-ft/ton Calculated | 261Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 593km368mi Calculated | 649km403mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 7,990cc488cu in | 5,987cc365cu in |
| Length | 4,448mm175in | 5,113mm201in |
| Width | 1,924mm76in | 1,886mm74in |
| Height | 1,117mm44in | 1,486mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,444mm96in | 3,040mm120in |
| Front track | 1,514mm60in | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,538mm61in | 1,579mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 334L | 525L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 2 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chrysler Viper RT/10 8.0 V10: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) S 600 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 5,150 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 5,400 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | 5,200 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.6 s | 20.2 s |
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 394 hp 294 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | 394 hp 294 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | 2,180 kg 4,806 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chrysler Viper RT/10 8.0 V10 and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) S 600 V12: 2.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chrysler Viper RT/10 8.0 V10 and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) S 600 V12: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 593 km 368 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | 649 km 403 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 394 hp 294 kW | 4.5 s | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | 394 hp 294 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 |
| 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 |
| 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Chrysler Viper RT/10 8.0 V10 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChryslerViper RT/108.0 V10 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W140)S 600 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 394 hp 294 kW | 394 hp 294 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 266 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 2,180 kg 4,806 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.0 L/100 km 16.8 mpg US 20.2 mpg UK | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 593 km 368 mi | 649 km 403 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 334 L 11.8 cu ft | 525 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 247 hp/t 184 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 181 hp/t 135 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chrysler Viper RT/10 8.0 V10 | Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) S 600 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK | 15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.50 LC100 km | 26.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.43 LC100 mi | 43.37 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,100 L555 US gal462 UK gal | 2,310 L610 US gal508 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,675 LC/year | 4,043 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chrysler Viper RT/10 8.0 V10
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 585 kg lighter
- Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 66 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W140) S 600 V12
- Has 56 km (35 mi) more estimated range
- Has 191 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























