Chrysler 300
Car comparison
Chrysler 300 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8vsJaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X250)
4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chrysler 300 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful425 hp317 kW
- Highest torque569 Nm420 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption16.8 L/100 km14.0 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range563 km350 mi
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score76/100
- Best economy score73/100
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Lightest1,842 kg4,061 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 425hp317kW | 416hp310kW |
| Torque | 569Nm420lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,888kg4,162lb | 1,842kg4,061lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 52.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.9s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 563km350mi Calculated | 556km345mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,059cc370cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 4,999mm197in | 4,961mm195in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,877mm74in |
| Height | 1,471mm58in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,048mm120in | 2,909mm115in |
| Front track | 1,600mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,571mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 442L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chrysler 300 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 6,200 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.9 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 425 hp 317 kW |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW |
Chrysler 300 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 has 9 hp more than Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 and Chrysler 300 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 569 Nm 420 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 1,888 kg 4,162 lb |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 5.0 s |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chrysler 300 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 and Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 563 km 350 mi |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 556 km 345 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 425 hp 317 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
| 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Chrysler 300 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Chrysler3006.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 425 hp 317 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 569 Nm 420 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,888 kg 4,162 lb | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 563 km 350 mi | 556 km 345 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chrysler 300 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8 | Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km | 22.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi | 35.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal | 1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year | 3,308 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chrysler 300 6.1 i V8 16V SRT-8
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 9 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km (4 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Is 46 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 98 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























