Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C7)
Car comparison
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C7) Stingray 6.2 V8vsWiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF4
S 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C7) Stingray 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful466 hp347 kW
- Highest torque630 Nm465 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions282 g/km
- Best estimated range569 km354 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score74/100
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight302 hp/t225 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption17.9 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.8 mpg UK
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 466hp347kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,664kg3,668lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 60.4s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 57.1s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.4L/100 km12.1mpg US14.6mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated | 302hp/t225kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 379Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km354mi Calculated | 565km351mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,492mm177in | 4,230mm167in |
| Width | 1,872mm74in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,243mm49in | 1,190mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,711mm107in | 2,507mm99in |
| Front track | 1,600mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 171L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 243L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 282g/km | 295g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C7) Stingray 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 196 km/h 122 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | 466 hp 347 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C7) Stingray 6.2 V8 has 46 hp more than Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8 and Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C7) Stingray 6.2 V8: 46 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | 1,664 kg 3,668 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 293 km/h 182 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | 4.2 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C7) Stingray 6.2 V8 and Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 302 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | 569 km 354 mi |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 565 km 351 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | 466 hp 347 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.4 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C7) Stingray 6.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 302 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C7)Stingray 6.2 V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 466 hp 347 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,664 kg 3,668 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 354 mi | 565 km 351 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 282 g/km | 295 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 171 L 6.0 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 302 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C7) Stingray 6.2 V8 | Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C7) Stingray 6.2 V8
- Has 46 hp more
- Has 230 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8
- Is 274 kg lighter
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























