Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6)
Car comparison
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8vsWiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann Roadster MF4
S 4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Highest torque543 Nm400 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score81/100
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight302 hp/t225 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 405hp302kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 543Nm400lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,490kg3,285lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.1s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 57.1s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.4s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 272hp/t203kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 302hp/t225kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 364Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 565km351mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,967cc364cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,435mm175in | 4,230mm167in |
| Width | 1,844mm73in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,246mm49in | 1,190mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,686mm106in | 2,507mm99in |
| Front track | 1,577mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 144L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 295L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 295g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.4 s | 13.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 122 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8 has 15 hp more than Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8 and Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 293 km/h 182 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 4.2 s |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 4.4 s |
Although Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8 has more power, Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8 and Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 302 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | 405 hp 302 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.4 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCorvette Convertible (C6)6.0 i V8 | WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 405 hp 302 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 543 Nm 400 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 565 km 351 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 295 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 144 L 5.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 302 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Corvette Convertible (C6) 6.0 i V8
- Has 143 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























