Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 6.2 V8vsLexus LC 500 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus LC
500 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Highest torque617 Nm455 lb-ft
- Lightest1,659 kg3,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight274 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk258 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Lexus LC 500 V8
- Most powerful464 hp346 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.6 L/100 km13.4 mpg US16.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range707 km439 mi
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | LexusLC500 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 455hp339kW | 464hp346kW |
| Torque | 617Nm455lb-ft | 530Nm391lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,659kg3,657lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,375kg5,236lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.3s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | 17.6L/100 km13.4mpg US16.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 274hp/t205kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 245hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 563km350mi Calculated | 707km439mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 4,969cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,770mm188in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,340mm53in | 1,345mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,811mm111in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,635mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 258L | 197L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | 292g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Lexus LC 500 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 5,700 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| LexusLC500 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | LexusLC500 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.3 s | 15.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 455 hp 339 kW |
| LexusLC500 V8 | 464 hp 346 kW |
Lexus LC 500 V8 has 9 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 and Lexus LC 500 V8: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft |
| LexusLC500 V8 | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb |
| LexusLC500 V8 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| LexusLC500 V8 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 4.6 s |
| LexusLC500 V8 | 4.7 s |
Although Lexus LC 500 V8 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 and Lexus LC 500 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| LexusLC500 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus LC 500 V8 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| LexusLC500 V8 | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 563 km 350 mi |
| LexusLC500 V8 | 707 km 439 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 455 hp 339 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| LexusLC500 V8 | 464 hp 346 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusLC500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusLC500 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Lexus LC 500 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| LexusLC500 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| LexusLC500 V8 | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | LexusLC500 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 455 hp 339 kW | 464 hp 346 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft | 530 Nm 391 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 563 km 350 mi | 707 km 439 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 292 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | 197 L 7.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 245 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 | Lexus LC 500 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km | 20.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year | 3,045 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8
- Has 87 Nm more
- Is 236 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 61 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lexus LC 500 V8
- Has 9 hp more
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 144 km (90 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























