Chevrolet Camaro VI
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8vsJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Coupe · Facelift 2020
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful453 hp338 kW
- Highest torque617 Nm455 lb-ft
- Lightest1,659 kg3,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight273 hp/t204 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions252 g/km
- Best estimated range636 km395 mi
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 453hp338kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 617Nm455lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,659kg3,657lb | 1,743kg3,843lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 65.4s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.3s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 258hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 563km350mi Calculated | 636km395mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,470mm176in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,340mm53in | 1,311mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Trunk volume | - | 299L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 509L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 292g/km | 252g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 5,700 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.3 s | 14.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 186 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 has 3 hp more than Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 1,743 kg 3,843 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 285 km/h 177 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 4.6 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 563 km 350 mi |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 636 km 395 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.6 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 |
| 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | JaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 453 hp 338 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 285 km/h 177 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb | 1,743 kg 3,843 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 11.0 L/100 km 21.4 mpg US 25.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 563 km 350 mi | 636 km 395 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 292 g/km | 252 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 299 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 | Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK | 11 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km | 19.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi | 30.98 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal | 1,650 L436 US gal363 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year | 2,888 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 37 Nm more
- Is 84 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-type Coupe Facelift 2020 5.0 V8
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 74 km (46 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 40 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























