Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI · Facelift 2018 6.2 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) · Facelift 2018
AMG C 63 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.0 s
- Most powerful476 hp355 kW
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight274 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions230 g/km
- Best estimated range653 km406 mi
- Largest trunk355 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,659 kg3,657 lb
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 455hp339kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 617Nm455lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,659kg3,657lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.4s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 49.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 3.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 274hp/t205kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 274hp/t205kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 375Nm/t251lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 653km406mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,897mm75in | 1,877mm74in |
| Height | 1,340mm53in | 1,401mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,811mm111in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | 1,636mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 101mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 258L | 355L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 252g/km | 230g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 5,700 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | - | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 3.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 13.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 192 km/h 119 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 455 hp 339 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8 has 21 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 and Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 4.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8 and Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 649 km 403 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 653 km 406 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 455 hp 339 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 455 hp 339 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 653 km 406 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 252 g/km | 230 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 258 L 9.1 cu ft | 355 L 12.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI Facelift 2018 6.2 V8
- Is 76 kg lighter
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) Facelift 2018 AMG C 63 V8
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 33 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range
- Has 97 L more trunk volume
- Emits 22 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























