Car comparison

Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0vsChevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche 911 (991 II)

Carrera 4 GTS 3.0

450 hp2981 ccGasolineAWDManualTwin-turboCoupe2017-2018
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI

6.2 V8

453 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    310 km/h
    193 mph
  • Lightest
    1,495 kg
    3,296 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    301 hp/t
    224 kW/t
    3.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.0 L/100 km
    18.1 mpg US
    21.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    216 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    705 km
    438 mi
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    85/100
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
450hp336kW
453hp338kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
617Nm455lb-ft
Curb weight
1,495kg3,296lb
1,659kg3,657lb
Gross weight
1,950kg4,299lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
310 km/h
193 mph
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
87.8s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph
Calculated
70.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
13.6s
13.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.1s
Calculated
12.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
301hp/t224kW/t137hp/1000 lb
Calculated
273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
368Nm/t246lb-ft/ton
Calculated
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
705km438mi
Calculated
649km403mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,981cc182cu in
6,162cc376cu in
Length
4,528mm178in
4,784mm188in
Width
1,852mm73in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,284mm51in
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase
2,450mm96in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,541mm61in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,544mm61in
1,604mm63in
Max trunk volume
385L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
67L
72L
CO2 emissions
216g/km
252g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.06,500 rpm2,150-5,000 rpm7,500 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V85,700 rpm4,600 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.6 s
13.7 s
Top speed
310 km/h
193 mph
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.8 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.1 s
12.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
189 km/h
118 mph
190 km/h
118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
450 hp
336 kW
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
453 hp
338 kW

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 has 3 hp more than Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0.

The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
617 Nm
455 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
1,659 kg
3,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
310 km/h
193 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.04.0 s
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V84.4 s

Although Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 has more power, Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
301 hp/t
224 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
705 km
438 mi
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
649 km
403 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
450 hp
336 kW
4.0 s
310 km/h
193 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
453 hp
338 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
310 km/h
193 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,528 mm
178.3 in
Height
1,284 mm
50.6 in
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
453 hp
338 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
310 km/h
193 mph
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
453 hp
338 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
4.0 s
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
301 hp/t
224 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
453 hp
338 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
617 Nm
455 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
4.4 s
Top speed
310 km/h
193 mph
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Lightness
1,495 kg
3,296 lb
1,659 kg
3,657 lb
Fuel consumption
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,528 mm
178.3 in
Height
1,284 mm
50.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
705 km
438 mi
649 km
403 mi
CO2 score
216 g/km
252 g/km
Trunk score
385 L
13.6 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
301 hp/t
224 kW/t
3.3 kg/hp
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
Consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.63 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.76 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,494 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0

  • Is 164 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 57 km (35 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 36 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 67 Nm more

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
Carrera S 3.0
VS
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0vsPorsche911 (992)Carrera S 3.0
6.2 V8
6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
Carrera GTS 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0vsPorsche911 (991)Carrera GTS 3.8
6.2 V8
6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8
Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
GT3 RS 3.8
VS
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008GT3 RS 3.8
6.2 V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
Carrera GTS 3.6
VS
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0vsPorsche911 (992)Facelift 2024Carrera GTS 3.6
6.2 V8
Grand sport 6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCorvette Coupe (C7)Grand sport 6.2 V8
Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
3.0
VS
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0vsPorsche911 Dakar (992)3.0
6.2 V8
Stingray 6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCorvette Convertible (C8)Stingray 6.2 V8
Carrera 4 GTS 3.0
Turbo 3.6
VS
Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera 4 GTS 3.0vsPorsche911 (997)Turbo 3.6
6.2 V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera 4 GTS 3.0 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster