Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8vsChevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190)

4.0 V8

462 hp3982 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2015-2017

Chevrolet Camaro VI

6.2 V8

453 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8

Quickest 0-100 km/h
4.0 s
Fastest top speed
304 km/h
189 mph
Most powerful
462 hp
345 kW
Lightest
1,615 kg
3,560 lb
Best power-to-weight
286 hp/t
213 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
12.2 L/100 km
19.3 mpg US
23.2 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Lowest CO2 emissions
216 g/km
Best estimated range
699 km
434 mi
Best performance score
86/100
Best economy score
82/100

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8

Highest torque
617 Nm
455 lb-ft
Best overall score
73/100
Best practicality score
52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power	462hp345kW	453hp338kW
Torque	600Nm443lb-ft	617Nm455lb-ft
Curb weight	1,615kg3,560lb	1,659kg3,657lb
Gross weight	1,890kg4,167lb	2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed	304 km/h 189 mph	Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	59.2s99% target: 301 km/h / 187 mph Calculated	70.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	4.0s	4.4s
0-200 km/h	11.9s Calculated	13.7s Calculated
0-60 mph	3.8s Calculated	4.2s Calculated
Fuel consumption	9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK	11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK	17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK	7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile	11.8s Calculated	12.4s Calculated
Power-to-weight	286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated	273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated	372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	699km434mi Calculated	649km403mi Calculated
Displacement	3,982cc243cu in	6,162cc376cu in
Length	4,546mm179in	4,784mm188in
Width	1,939mm76in	1,880mm74in
Height	1,288mm51in	1,340mm53in
Wheelbase	2,630mm104in	2,812mm111in
Front track	1,680mm66in	1,610mm63in
Rear track	1,651mm65in	1,604mm63in
Ground clearance	98mm4in	-
Doors	2	2
Seats	2	4
Fuel tank	65L	72L
CO2 emissions	216g/km	252g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	6,000 rpm	1,600-5,000 rpm	6,250 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	5,700 rpm	4,600 rpm	5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	3.8 s	4.2 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	4.0 s	4.4 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	11.9 s	13.7 s
Top speed	304 km/h 189 mph	Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.0 s	2.1 s
330 ft 101 m	5.3 s	5.4 s
1/8 mile 201 m	7.8 s	8.1 s
1000 ft 305 m	10.0 s	10.4 s
1/4 mile 402 m	11.8 s	12.4 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	200 km/h 124 mph	190 km/h 118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	462 hp 345 kW
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	453 hp 338 kW

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 has 9 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	600 Nm 443 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	617 Nm 455 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	1,615 kg 3,560 lb
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	1,659 kg 3,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	304 km/h 189 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	4.0 s
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	4.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	699 km 434 mi
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	649 km 403 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	462 hp 345 kW	4.0 s	304 km/h 189 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	453 hp 338 kW	4.4 s	Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8

Power	462 hp 345 kW
0-100 km/h	4.0 s
Top speed 304 km/h 189 mph

Doors/seats	2 doors 2 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,546 mm 179.0 in
Height	1,288 mm 50.7 in

ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8

Power	453 hp 338 kW
0-100 km/h	4.4 s
Top speed Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,784 mm 188.3 in
Height	1,340 mm 52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8

Power	462 hp 345 kW
0-100 km/h	4.0 s
Top speed 304 km/h 189 mph

9.3 L/100 km

25.3 mpg US

30.4 mpg UK

ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8

Power	453 hp 338 kW
0-100 km/h	4.4 s
Top speed Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph

11.1 L/100 km

21.2 mpg US

25.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK	4.0 s
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK	4.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8	286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp	9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8	273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp	11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C190)4.0 V8

ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8

Power

462 hp

345 kW

453 hp

338 kW

Torque

600 Nm

443 lb-ft

617 Nm

455 lb-ft

Acceleration

4.0 s

4.4 s

Top speed

304 km/h

189 mph

Unrestricted

300 km/h186 mph

Restricted

290 km/h180 mph

Lightness

1,615 kg

3,560 lb

1,659 kg

3,657 lb

Fuel consumption

9.3 L/100 km

25.3 mpg US

30.4 mpg UK

11.1 L/100 km

21.2 mpg US

25.4 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	2 doors 2 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,546 mm 179.0 in
Height	1,288 mm 50.7 in

Doors/seats	2 doors 4 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,784 mm 188.3 in
Height	1,340 mm 52.8 in

Range score

699 km

434 mi

649 km

403 mi

CO2 score

216 g/km

252 g/km

Power-to-weight score

286 hp/t

213 kW/t

3.5 kg/hp

273 hp/t

204 kW/t

3.7 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C190) 4.0 V8	Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
Consumption	9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK	11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	16.28 LC100 km	19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	26.19 LC100 mi	31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal	1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,441 LC/year	2,914 LC/year