Car comparison

Maserati GranTurismo I · Facelift 2017 MC 4.7 V8vsChevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Maserati GranTurismo I · Facelift 2017

MC 4.7 V8

460 hp4691 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2017-2019
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI

6.2 V8

453 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.4 s
  • Highest torque
    617 Nm
    455 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,659 kg
    3,657 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    273 hp/t
    204 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.0 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    252 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    649 km
    403 mi
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    83/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
460hp343kW
453hp338kW
Torque
520Nm384lb-ft
617Nm455lb-ft
Curb weight
1,773kg3,909lb
1,659kg3,657lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.3s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
70.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
14.4s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.7s
Calculated
12.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
259hp/t193kW/t118hp/1000 lb
Calculated
273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton
Calculated
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
601km374mi
Calculated
649km403mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,691cc286cu in
6,162cc376cu in
Length
4,920mm194in
4,784mm188in
Width
1,915mm75in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,353mm53in
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase
2,942mm116in
2,812mm111in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,610mm63in
Rear track
1,590mm63in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
260L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
86L
72L
CO2 emissions
331g/km
252g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 MC 4.7 V8Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 MC 4.7 V8: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V87,000 rpm4,750 rpm7,250 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V85,700 rpm4,600 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.4 s
13.7 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.7 s
12.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
187 km/h
116 mph
190 km/h
118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
460 hp
343 kW
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
453 hp
338 kW

Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 MC 4.7 V8 has 7 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 MC 4.7 V8: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
617 Nm
455 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
1,773 kg
3,909 lb
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
1,659 kg
3,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
301 km/h
187 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 MC 4.7 V8 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 MC 4.7 V8: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
14.3 L/100 km
16.4 mpg US
19.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 MC 4.7 V8: 3.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
259 hp/t
193 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
601 km
374 mi
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
649 km
403 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
460 hp
343 kW
4.7 s
301 km/h
187 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
453 hp
338 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
453 hp
338 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
Power
460 hp
343 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
14.3 L/100 km
16.4 mpg US
19.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
453 hp
338 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
14.3 L/100 km
16.4 mpg US
19.8 mpg UK
4.7 s
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8
259 hp/t
193 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
14.3 L/100 km
16.4 mpg US
19.8 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMaseratiGranTurismo IFacelift 2017MC 4.7 V8ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
460 hp
343 kW
453 hp
338 kW
Torque
520 Nm
384 lb-ft
617 Nm
455 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
4.4 s
Top speed
301 km/h
187 mph
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Lightness
1,773 kg
3,909 lb
1,659 kg
3,657 lb
Fuel consumption
14.3 L/100 km
16.4 mpg US
19.8 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
260 L
9.2 cu ft
Length
4,920 mm
193.7 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
601 km
374 mi
649 km
403 mi
CO2 score
331 g/km
252 g/km
Trunk score
260 L
9.2 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
259 hp/t
193 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMaserati GranTurismo I Facelift 2017 MC 4.7 V8Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
Consumption14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km25.03 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi40.27 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,754 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8

  • Has 97 Nm more
  • Is 114 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 47 km (29 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 79 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Maserati GranTurismo I MC 4.7 V8
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Maserati GranTurismo I · Facelift 2017 MC 4.7 V8 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster