Car comparison

Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6vsChevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lotus Evora Sport 410

3.5 V6

410 hp3456 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2016-2018
VS

Chevrolet Camaro VI

6.2 V8

453 hp6162 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    300 km/h
    186 mph
  • Lightest
    1,325 kg
    2,921 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    309 hp/t
    231 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.6 L/100 km
    17.3 mpg US
    20.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    225 g/km
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8

  • Most powerful
    453 hp
    338 kW
  • Highest torque
    617 Nm
    455 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    649 km
    403 mi
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    83/100
  • Best practicality score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
410hp306kW
453hp338kW
Torque
410Nm302lb-ft
617Nm455lb-ft
Curb weight
1,325kg2,921lb
1,659kg3,657lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
59.6s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
70.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
12.5s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.1s
Calculated
12.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
309hp/t231kW/t140hp/1000 lb
Calculated
273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton
Calculated
372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
619km384mi
Calculated
649km403mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,456cc211cu in
6,162cc376cu in
Length-
4,784mm188in
Width-
1,880mm74in
Height-
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase-
2,812mm111in
Front track-
1,610mm63in
Rear track-
1,604mm63in
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
60L
72L
CO2 emissions
225g/km
252g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8PowerTorque
  • Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V67,000 rpm3,500 rpm7,250 rpm
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V85,700 rpm4,600 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.5 s
13.7 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.2 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.1 s
12.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
197 km/h
122 mph
190 km/h
118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
410 hp
306 kW
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
453 hp
338 kW

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 has 43 hp more than Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 43 hp (32 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
617 Nm
455 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
1,325 kg
2,921 lb
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
1,659 kg
3,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
300 km/h
186 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V64.2 s
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V84.4 s

Although Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 has more power, Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
309 hp/t
231 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
619 km
384 mi
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
649 km
403 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
410 hp
306 kW
4.2 s
300 km/h
186 mph
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
453 hp
338 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
Power
410 hp
306 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
453 hp
338 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
Power
410 hp
306 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
453 hp
338 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
4.2 s
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6
309 hp/t
231 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8
Power
410 hp
306 kW
453 hp
338 kW
Torque
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
617 Nm
455 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
4.4 s
Top speed
300 km/h
186 mph
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Lightness
1,325 kg
2,921 lb
1,659 kg
3,657 lb
Fuel consumption
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length-
Height-
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
619 km
384 mi
649 km
403 mi
CO2 score
225 g/km
252 g/km
Power-to-weight score
309 hp/t
231 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
273 hp/t
204 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
Consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.97 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.32 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,546 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6

  • Is 334 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 27 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8

  • Has 43 hp more
  • Has 207 Nm more
  • Has 30 km (19 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora 4003.5 V6
6.2 V8
6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20186.2 V8
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT410 Sport3.5 V6
6.2 V8
6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible6.2 V8
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT3.5 V6
6.2 V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
3.5 V6
3.5 V6 24V
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V
6.2 V8
Grand sport 6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCorvette Coupe (C7)Grand sport 6.2 V8
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora GT4103.5 V6
6.2 V8
Stingray 6.2 V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCorvette Convertible (C8)Stingray 6.2 V8
3.5 V6
3.5 V6
VS
LotusEvora Sport 4103.5 V6vsLotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
6.2 V8
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8vsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
Lotus Evora Sport 410 3.5 V6 vs Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster