Chevrolet Camaro VI
Car comparison
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8vsLotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Evora GT430
3.5 V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful453 hp338 kW
- Highest torque617 Nm455 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range649 km403 mi
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score83/100
- Best practicality score52/100
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight333 hp/t248 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.2 L/100 km15.5 mpg US18.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions247 g/km
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 453hp338kW | 436hp325kW |
| Torque | 617Nm455lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,659kg3,657lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 48.3s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 10.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 273hp/t204kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated | 333hp/t248kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 344Nm/t230lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 649km403mi Calculated | 556km345mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,162cc376cu in | 3,456cc211cu in |
| Length | 4,784mm188in | 4,396mm173in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,340mm53in | 1,229mm48in |
| Wheelbase | 2,812mm111in | 2,575mm101in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 160L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 252g/km | 247g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 5,700 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 10.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 436 hp 325 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 has 17 hp more than Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 4.4 s |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 3.7 s |
Although Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 has more power, Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V and Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 649 km 403 mi |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 556 km 345 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 453 hp 338 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 436 hp 325 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V |
| 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ChevroletCamaro VI6.2 V8 | LotusEvora GT4303.5 V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 453 hp 338 kW | 436 hp 325 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 617 Nm 455 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km 21.8 mpg US 26.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 649 km 403 mi | 556 km 345 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 252 g/km | 247 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 273 hp/t 204 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 333 hp/t 248 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8 | Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 18.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 30.42 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,620 L428 US gal356 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,835 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Chevrolet Camaro VI 6.2 V8
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 167 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 93 km (58 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Lotus Evora GT430 3.5 V6 24V
- Is 349 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 60 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























