Car comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6vsPorsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Chevrolet Camaro VI

3.6 V6

335 hp3640 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2016-2018
VS

Porsche Cayman (981C)

GTS 3.4

340 hp3436 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2014-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4

  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Lightest
    1,375 kg
    3,031 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    247 hp/t
    184 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.2 L/100 km
    28.7 mpg US
    34.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.4 L/100 km
    20.6 mpg US
    24.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    780 km
    485 mi
  • Largest trunk
    425 L
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    300 km/h
    186 mph Unrestricted
    290 km/h
    180 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    385 Nm
    284 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    73/100
  • Best practicality score
    46/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
Power
335hp250kW
340hp254kW
Torque
385Nm284lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,558kg3,435lb
1,375kg3,031lb
Gross weight-
1,695kg3,737lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Calculated
283 km/h
176 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph
Calculated
65.0s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
4.8s
0-200 km/h
14.9s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
4.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.6s
Calculated
12.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
215hp/t160kW/t98hp/1000 lb
Calculated
247hp/t184kW/t112hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
610km379mi
Calculated
780km485mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,640cc222cu in
3,436cc210cu in
Length
4,784mm188in
4,404mm173in
Width
1,897mm75in
1,801mm71in
Height
1,348mm53in
1,284mm51in
Wheelbase
2,812mm111in
2,475mm97in
Front track
1,588mm63in
-
Rear track
1,617mm64in
-
Trunk volume
258L
425L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
72L
64L
CO2 emissions-
190g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4PowerTorque
  • Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V66,800 rpm5,300 rpm7,050 rpm
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.47,400 rpm4,750-5,800 rpm7,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
4.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
4.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.9 s
15.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Likely limited
283 km/h
176 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.5 s
5.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
10.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.6 s
12.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
185 km/h
115 mph
185 km/h
115 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
335 hp
250 kW
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
340 hp
254 kW

Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 has 5 hp more than Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 and Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
385 Nm
284 lb-ft
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
1,558 kg
3,435 lb
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
1,375 kg
3,031 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
283 km/h
176 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V64.6 s
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.44.8 s

Although Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 has more power, Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 and Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 and Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
215 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
247 hp/t
184 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
610 km
379 mi
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
780 km
485 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
335 hp
250 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
340 hp
254 kW
4.8 s
283 km/h
176 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
Power
335 hp
250 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,404 mm
173.4 in
Height
1,284 mm
50.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
Power
335 hp
250 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
283 km/h
176 mph
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
4.6 s
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
4.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6
215 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
247 hp/t
184 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4
Power
335 hp
250 kW
340 hp
254 kW
Torque
385 Nm
284 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
4.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
300 km/h186 mph
Restricted
290 km/h180 mph
283 km/h
176 mph
Lightness
1,558 kg
3,435 lb
1,375 kg
3,031 lb
Fuel consumption
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
8.2 L/100 km
28.7 mpg US
34.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,784 mm
188.3 in
Height
1,348 mm
53.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,404 mm
173.4 in
Height
1,284 mm
50.6 in
Range score
610 km
379 mi
780 km
485 mi
CO2 score
-
190 g/km
Trunk score
258 L
9.1 cu ft
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
215 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
247 hp/t
184 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleChevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km14.35 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi23.09 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year2,153 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 183 kg lighter
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 170 km (106 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 167 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6
Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.6 V6
2.0 T
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6vsChevroletCamaro VIFacelift 20182.0 T
GTS 3.4
R 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4vsPorscheCayman (987C)Facelift 2009R 3.4
3.6 V6
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6vsChevroletCamaro IVZ28 5.7 i V8
GTS 3.4
S 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4vsPorscheCayman (987C)S 3.4
3.6 V6
2.0
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6vsChevroletCamaro VI Convertible2.0
GTS 3.4
Carrera 4 3.4
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4vsPorsche911 (991)Carrera 4 3.4
3.6 V6
Z28 5.7 i V8
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6vsChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8
GTS 3.4
S 2.5
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4vsPorsche718 Cayman (982)S 2.5
3.6 V6
C 400
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 400
GTS 3.4
Carrera 3.0
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4vsPorsche911 (991 II)Carrera 3.0
GTS 3.4
3.5 V6
VS
PorscheCayman (981C)GTS 3.4vsLotusEvora Sports Racer3.5 V6
3.6 V6
3.0 V6
VS
ChevroletCamaro VI3.6 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20173.0 V6
Chevrolet Camaro VI 3.6 V6 vs Porsche Cayman (981C) GTS 3.4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster