Car comparison

Cadillac GT4 28TvsMG MGS6 EV 77 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac GT4

28T

237 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-present
VS

MG MGS6 EV

77 kWh

245 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSUV2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

MG MGS6 EV 77 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Most powerful
    245 hp
    183 kW
  • Largest trunk
    674 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Cadillac GT4 28T

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,760 kg
    3,880 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    135 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacGT428TMGMGS6 EV77 kWh
Power
237hp177kW
245hp183kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,760kg3,880lb
1,908kg4,206lb
Gross weight-
2,388kg5,265lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
79.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
73.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
37.7s
Calculated
45.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
813km505mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
-
Length
4,633mm182in
4,708mm185in
Width
1,878mm74in
1,912mm75in
Height
1,535mm60in
1,664mm66in
Wheelbase
2,800mm110in
2,835mm112in
Front track
1,604mm63in
1,622mm64in
Rear track
1,607mm63in
1,612mm63in
Ground clearance
131mm5in
-
Trunk volume
289L
674L
Max trunk volume
1,190L
1,910L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
61L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacGT428TMGMGS6 EV77 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
37.7 s
45.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
237 hp
177 kW
MGMGS6 EV77 kWh
245 hp
183 kW

MG MGS6 EV 77 kWh has 8 hp more than Cadillac GT4 28T.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac GT4 28T and MG MGS6 EV 77 kWh: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
MGMGS6 EV77 kWh
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
MGMGS6 EV77 kWh
1,908 kg
4,206 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
MGMGS6 EV77 kWh
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T7.8 s
MGMGS6 EV77 kWh7.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG MGS6 EV 77 kWh and Cadillac GT4 28T: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacGT428T
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
MGMGS6 EV77 kWh
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacGT428T
237 hp
177 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
MGMGS6 EV77 kWh
245 hp
183 kW
7.3 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacGT428T
Power
237 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
MGMGS6 EV77 kWh
Power
245 hp
183 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
674 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,708 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacGT428TMGMGS6 EV77 kWh
Power
237 hp
177 kW
245 hp
183 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
1,908 kg
4,206 lb
Fuel consumption
7.5 L/100 km
31.4 mpg US
37.7 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
289 L
10.2 cu ft
Length
4,633 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
674 L
23.8 cu ft
Length
4,708 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in
Range score
813 km
505 mi
-
Trunk score
289 L
10.2 cu ft
674 L
23.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac GT4 28T
Consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.12 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,969 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac GT4 28T

  • Is 148 kg lighter
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

MG MGS6 EV 77 kWh

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 385 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac GT4 28T
MG MGS6 EV 77 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

28T
EQE 300 98 kWh
VS
CadillacGT428TvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 98 kWh
28T
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
CadillacGT428TvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
77 kWh
JCW 54.2 kWh
VS
MGMGS6 EV77 kWhvsMiniAceman (J05)JCW 54.2 kWh
28T
45 TFSI
VS
CadillacGT428TvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)45 TFSI
77 kWh
450TSI
VS
MGMGS6 EV77 kWhvsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
28T
45 TDI V6
VS
CadillacGT428TvsAUDIQ8 (4M)Facelift 202345 TDI V6
77 kWh
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MGMGS6 EV77 kWhvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
28T
2.0i
VS
CadillacGT428TvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
77 kWh
Turismo 54 kWh
VS
MGMGS6 EV77 kWhvsAbarth600eTurismo 54 kWh
77 kWh
2.0
VS
MGMGS6 EV77 kWhvsMaseratiGrecaleFacelift 20262.0
28T
40 TFSI
VS
CadillacGT428TvsAUDIQ640 TFSI
77 kWh
2.0 TFSI
VS
MGMGS6 EV77 kWhvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
Cadillac GT4 28T vs MG MGS6 EV 77 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster