Cadillac CTS III
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 400 V6 3.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
E 400 V6 3.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 400 V6 3.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range835 km519 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Best power-to-weight192 hp/t143 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 333hp248kW |
| Torque | 386Nm285lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 51.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.9s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 191hp/t142kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | 835km519mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,649cc223cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,966mm196in | 4,923mm194in |
| Width | 1,833mm72in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,910mm115in | 2,939mm116in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,619mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 388L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 400 V6 3.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 5,300 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.9 s | 15.6 s |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | 333 hp 248 kW |
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 400 V6 3.5.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 400 V6 3.5 and Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 386 Nm 285 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | 5.2 s |
Although Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 400 V6 3.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 400 V6 3.5 and Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 400 V6 3.5 and Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 766 km 476 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | 835 km 519 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.7 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | 333 hp 248 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 400 V6 3.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 400 V6 3.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 333 hp 248 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 386 Nm 285 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | 835 km 519 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 388 L 13.7 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 191 hp/t 142 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 400 V6 3.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 400 V6 3.5
- Has 94 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range
- Has 152 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























