Cadillac CTS III
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6vsMaserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Quattroporte VI (M156)
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,760 kg3,880 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range879 km546 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Best power-to-weight192 hp/t143 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 330hp246kW |
| Torque | 386Nm285lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 67.0s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.9s Calculated | 21.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | 879km546mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,649cc223cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,966mm196in | 5,262mm207in |
| Width | 1,833mm72in | 1,948mm77in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,481mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,910mm115in | 3,171mm125in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,634mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,647mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 388L | 530L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 212g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 5,300 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 5,000 rpm | 1,750-5,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.9 s | 21.6 s |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 330 hp 246 kW |
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 has 10 hp more than Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 and Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 386 Nm 285 lb-ft |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 6.7 s |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 and Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 766 km 476 mi |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 879 km 546 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.7 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 330 hp 246 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 330 hp 246 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 386 Nm 285 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 255 km/h158 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | 879 km 546 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 212 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 388 L 13.7 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 | Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6
- Has 114 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range
- Has 142 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























