Car comparison

Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6vsMaserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac CTS III

3.6 V6

340 hp3649 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2014-2019
VS

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156)

3.0 V6

330 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2015-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6

  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,760 kg
    3,880 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    879 km
    546 mi
  • Largest trunk
    530 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    280 km/h
    174 mph
  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    192 hp/t
    143 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest city consumption
    12.7 L/100 km
    18.5 mpg US
    22.2 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    64/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacCTS III3.6 V6MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
Power
340hp254kW
330hp246kW
Torque
386Nm285lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,775kg3,913lb
1,760kg3,880lb
Top speed
280 km/h
174 mph
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
77.7s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph
Calculated
67.0s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.8s
0-200 km/h
19.9s
Calculated
21.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb
Calculated
188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
217Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
766km476mi
Calculated
879km546mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,649cc223cu in
2,979cc182cu in
Length
4,966mm196in
5,262mm207in
Width
1,833mm72in
1,948mm77in
Height
1,454mm57in
1,481mm58in
Wheelbase
2,910mm115in
3,171mm125in
Front track
1,560mm61in
1,634mm64in
Rear track
1,568mm62in
1,647mm65in
Trunk volume
388L
530L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
72L
80L
CO2 emissions-
212g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6PowerTorque
  • Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
  • Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacCTS III3.6 V66,800 rpm5,300 rpm7,050 rpm
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V65,000 rpm1,750-5,000 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacCTS III3.6 V6MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.9 s
21.6 s
Top speed
280 km/h
174 mph
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
169 km/h
105 mph
166 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
340 hp
254 kW
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
330 hp
246 kW

Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 has 10 hp more than Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 and Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
386 Nm
285 lb-ft
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
1,775 kg
3,913 lb
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
1,760 kg
3,880 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
280 km/h
174 mph
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III3.6 V66.7 s
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V66.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 and Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
766 km
476 mi
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
879 km
546 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
340 hp
254 kW
6.7 s
280 km/h
174 mph
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
330 hp
246 kW
6.8 s
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
280 km/h
174 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
388 L
13.7 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
5,262 mm
207.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
280 km/h
174 mph
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
Power
330 hp
246 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
6.7 s
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
6.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacCTS III3.6 V6
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacCTS III3.6 V6MaseratiQuattroporte VI (M156)3.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
330 hp
246 kW
Torque
386 Nm
285 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.8 s
Top speed
280 km/h
174 mph
Unrestricted
255 km/h158 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,775 kg
3,913 lb
1,760 kg
3,880 lb
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100 km
25.0 mpg US
30.1 mpg UK
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
388 L
13.7 cu ft
Length
4,966 mm
195.5 in
Height
1,454 mm
57.2 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Length
5,262 mm
207.2 in
Height
1,481 mm
58.3 in
Range score
766 km
476 mi
879 km
546 mi
CO2 score
-
212 g/km
Trunk score
388 L
13.7 cu ft
530 L
18.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
188 hp/t
140 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac CTS III 3.6 V6Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6
Consumption9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.45 LC100 km15.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.47 LC100 mi25.63 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,468 LC/year2,389 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6

  • Has 114 Nm more
  • Is 15 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 142 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6
Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 vs Maserati Quattroporte VI (M156) 3.0 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster