Cadillac CTS III
Car comparison
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,765 kg3,891 lb
- Best power-to-weight193 hp/t144 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range879 km546 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6
- Fastest top speed280 km/h174 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 386Nm285lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.7s99% target: 277 km/h / 172 mph Calculated | 62.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.9s Calculated | 18.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 217Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | 879km546mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,649cc223cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,966mm196in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,833mm72in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,910mm115in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 388L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 5,300 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.9 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 169 km/h 105 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 386 Nm 285 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 6.7 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 and Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 766 km 476 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 879 km 546 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.7 s | 280 km/h 174 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacCTS III3.6 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 386 Nm 285 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 280 km/h 174 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | 879 km 546 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 388 L 13.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6 | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac CTS III 3.6 V6
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Has 64 Nm more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























