Car comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6vsSkoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.8 T V6

255 hp2792 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009
VS

Skoda Superb II Combi

3.6 FSI V6

260 hp3597 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2009-2013

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.4 L/100 km
    16.3 mpg US
    19.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    588 km
    366 mi
  • Largest trunk
    633 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6

  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,605 kg
    3,538 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
Power
255hp190kW
260hp194kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,605kg3,538lb
1,671kg3,684lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,307kg5,086lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
247 km/h
153 mph
To 99% top speed
78.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
68.7s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
25.4s
Calculated
23.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
156hp/t116kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
542km337mi
Calculated
588km366mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,792cc170cu in
3,597cc220cu in
Length
4,716mm186in
4,838mm190in
Width
1,802mm71in
1,817mm72in
Height
1,543mm61in
1,510mm59in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,761mm109in
Front track
1,524mm60in
1,545mm61in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,517mm60in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
141mm6in
Trunk volume
419L
633L
Max trunk volume
1,273L
1,865L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6PowerTorque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V65,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V66,000 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.4 s
23.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
247 km/h
153 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW

Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6 has 5 hp more than Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 and Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
1,671 kg
3,684 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
247 km/h
153 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V67.4 s
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V66.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6 and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6 and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
542 km
337 mi
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
588 km
366 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
260 hp
194 kW
6.6 s
247 km/h
153 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,510 mm
59.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
247 km/h
153 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
7.4 s
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
247 km/h
153 mph
Lightness
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
1,671 kg
3,684 lb
Fuel consumption
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Length
4,838 mm
190.5 in
Height
1,510 mm
59.4 in
Range score
542 km
337 mi
588 km
366 mi
Trunk score
419 L
14.8 cu ft
633 L
22.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
156 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6
Consumption10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.72 LC100 km17.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.13 LC100 mi28.73 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,809 LC/year2,678 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6

  • Is 66 kg lighter
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 46 km (29 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 214 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.8 T V6
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
3.6 FSI V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6vsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B6)3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
3.6 FSI V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6
3.6 FSI V6
R 350 CDI V6
VS
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6vsMercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
3.6 FSI V6
2.0 T5
VS
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6vsVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
2.8 T V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
3.6 FSI V6
CLS 350 BlueTEC V6
VS
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6vsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)Facelift 2014CLS 350 BlueTEC V6
2.8 T V6
2.4i 20V T5
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
3.6 FSI V6
330d
VS
SkodaSuperb II Combi3.6 FSI V6vsBMW3 Series Touring (F31)330d
2.8 T V6
330xi
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsBMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 vs Skoda Superb II Combi 3.6 FSI V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster