Car comparison

MG ZT-T 4.6 V8vsCadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

MG ZT-T

4.6 V8

260 hp4601 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2003-2005
VS

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.8 T V6

255 hp2792 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

MG ZT-T 4.6 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    410 Nm
    302 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.7 L/100 km
    22.0 mpg US
    26.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.2 L/100 km
    14.5 mpg US
    17.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    542 km
    337 mi
  • Largest trunk
    419 L
  • Best economy score
    78/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMGZT-T4.6 V8CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
260hp194kW
255hp190kW
Torque
410Nm302lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,605kg3,538lb
Gross weight-
2,150kg4,740lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
73.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
78.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
21.7s
Calculated
25.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK
16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
500km311mi
Calculated
542km337mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,601cc281cu in
2,792cc170cu in
Length
4,790mm189in
4,716mm186in
Width
1,850mm73in
1,802mm71in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,543mm61in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,675mm105in
Front track
1,560mm61in
1,524mm60in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,506mm59in
Ground clearance-
127mm5in
Trunk volume
400L
419L
Max trunk volume
1,220L
1,273L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
58L
CO2 emissions
314g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

MG ZT-T 4.6 V8Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6PowerTorque
  • MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MGZT-T4.6 V85,250 rpm4,000 rpm6,000 rpm
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V65,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMGZT-T4.6 V8CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.7 s
25.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
103 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW

MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 has 5 hp more than Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 and MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
1,605 kg
3,538 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V86.7 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V67.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 and MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
500 km
311 mi
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
542 km
337 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MGZT-T4.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MGZT-T4.6 V8
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
400 L
14.1 cu ft
Length
4,790 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MGZT-T4.6 V8
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MGZT-T4.6 V8
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
6.7 s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MGZT-T4.6 V8
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMGZT-T4.6 V8CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
260 hp
194 kW
255 hp
190 kW
Torque
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
Fuel consumption
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
400 L
14.1 cu ft
Length
4,790 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Range score
500 km
311 mi
542 km
337 mi
CO2 score
314 g/km
-
Trunk score
400 L
14.1 cu ft
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMG ZT-T 4.6 V8Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
Consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.10 LC100 km18.72 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.18 LC100 mi30.13 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,465 LC/year2,809 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

MG ZT-T 4.6 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 5 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6

  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 19 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.6 V8
2.4i 20V T5
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
2.8 T V6
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
4.6 V8
330xi
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsBMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi
2.8 T V6
3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B6)3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
4.6 V8
330i
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsBMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330i
2.8 T V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
4.6 V8
3.2 FSI V6
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsAUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
4.6 V8
4.0 W8 32V
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B5.5)4.0 W8 32V
4.6 V8
2.7 T V6
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsAUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 T V6
4.6 V8
535d
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsBMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d
2.8 T V6
2.5 T5
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 vs Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster