Car comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6vsMercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac BLS Wagon

2.8 T V6

255 hp2792 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2007-2009
VS

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010

R 350 CDI V6

265 hp2987 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2010-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6

  • Most powerful
    265 hp
    198 kW
  • Highest torque
    620 Nm
    457 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.5 L/100 km
    27.7 mpg US
    33.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.0 L/100 km
    21.4 mpg US
    25.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    941 km
    585 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    57/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    250 km/h
    155 mph Unrestricted
    240 km/h
    149 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,605 kg
    3,538 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    159 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
Power
255hp190kW
265hp198kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
620Nm457lb-ft
Curb weight
1,605kg3,538lb
2,175kg4,795lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
2,880kg6,349lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
235 km/h
146 mph
To 99% top speed
78.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
87.8s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
25.4s
Calculated
31.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
542km337mi
Calculated
941km585mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,792cc170cu in
2,987cc182cu in
Length
4,716mm186in
4,922mm194in
Width
1,802mm71in
1,922mm76in
Height
1,543mm61in
1,674mm66in
Wheelbase
2,675mm105in
2,980mm117in
Front track
1,524mm60in
1,661mm65in
Rear track
1,506mm59in
1,651mm65in
Ground clearance
127mm5in
-
Trunk volume
419L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,273L
1,950L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
58L
80L
CO2 emissions-
223g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6PowerTorque
  • Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V65,500 rpm1,800-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V63,800 rpm1,600-2,400 rpm4,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.4 s
31.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
235 km/h
146 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
151 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
265 hp
198 kW

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 has 10 hp more than Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6.

The biggest power difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
620 Nm
457 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
2,175 kg
4,795 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
235 km/h
146 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V67.4 s
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V67.6 s

Although Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 has more power, Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 and Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 and Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
542 km
337 mi
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
941 km
585 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
255 hp
190 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
265 hp
198 kW
7.6 s
235 km/h
146 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
Power
265 hp
198 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
7.4 s
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6
Power
255 hp
190 kW
265 hp
198 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
235 km/h
146 mph
Lightness
1,605 kg
3,538 lb
2,175 kg
4,795 lb
Fuel consumption
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
8.5 L/100 km
27.7 mpg US
33.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
419 L
14.8 cu ft
Length
4,716 mm
185.7 in
Height
1,543 mm
60.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,922 mm
193.8 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Range score
542 km
337 mi
941 km
585 mi
CO2 score
-
223 g/km
Trunk score
419 L
14.8 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6
Consumption10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.72 LC100 km14.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.13 LC100 mi23.94 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,809 LC/year2,231 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6

  • Is 570 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 270 Nm more
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 399 km (248 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 131 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6
Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) R 350 CDI V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.8 T V6
2.8 T V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsCadillacBLS2.8 T V6
R 350 CDI V6
R 500 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6vsMercedes-BenzR-class (W251)R 500 V8
2.8 T V6
3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B6)3.2 i V6 24V FSI 4WD
R 350 CDI V6
CLS 350 BlueTEC V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6vsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)Facelift 2014CLS 350 BlueTEC V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 JTS V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAlfa Romeo159 Sportwagon3.2 JTS V6
R 350 CDI V6
2.0 T5
VS
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6vsVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
2.8 T V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAUDIA6 allroad (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
R 350 CDI V6
3.0 TDI V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)3.0 TDI V6
2.8 T V6
3.2 FSI V6
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
2.8 T V6
2.4i 20V T5
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
R 350 CDI V6
2.0 TSI
VS
Mercedes-BenzR-class (W251)Facelift 2010R 350 CDI V6vsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B7)2.0 TSI
2.8 T V6
330xi
VS
CadillacBLS Wagon2.8 T V6vsBMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi
Cadillac BLS Wagon 2.8 T V6 vs Mercedes-Benz R-class (W251) · Facelift 2010 R 350 CDI V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster