Buick Envision II
Car comparison
Buick Envision II Plus 652TvsVolkswagen Tavendor 380TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tavendor
380TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful237 hp177 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,890 kg4,167 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t94 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.7 mpg US36.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score86/100
Volkswagen Tavendor 380TSI
- Largest trunk656 L
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | VolkswagenTavendor380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 237hp177kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,890kg4,167lb | 2,065kg4,553lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 92.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 104.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 9.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.7s Calculated | 62.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.7mpg US36.9mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27.1mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 889km552mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,845mm191in | 4,949mm195in |
| Width | 1,883mm74in | 2,015mm79in |
| Height | 1,695mm67in | 1,772mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,833mm112in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,610mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,612mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 515L | 656L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,712L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Buick Envision II Plus 652T: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tavendor 380TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | 4,500-6,700 rpm | 1,500-4,300 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | VolkswagenTavendor380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.7 s | 62.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 136 km/h 85 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW |
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Buick Envision II Plus 652T has 17 hp more than Volkswagen Tavendor 380TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tavendor 380TSI and Buick Envision II Plus 652T: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb |
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | 2,065 kg 4,553 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | 9.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Buick Envision II Plus 652T and Volkswagen Tavendor 380TSI: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | 8.7 L/100 km 27.1 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Buick Envision II Plus 652T and Volkswagen Tavendor 380TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 237 hp 177 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 9.1 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.1 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Buick Envision II Plus 652T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | 8.7 L/100 km 27.1 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 9.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.1 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BuickEnvision IIPlus 652T | VolkswagenTavendor380TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 237 hp 177 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 9.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,890 kg 4,167 lb | 2,065 kg 4,553 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.7 mpg US 36.9 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.1 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 889 km 552 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 515 L 18.2 cu ft | 656 L 23.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 94 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Buick Envision II Plus 652T | Volkswagen Tavendor 380TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.7 mpg US36.9 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27.1 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.39 LC100 km | 15.19 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.55 LC100 mi | 24.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,148 L303 US gal252 UK gal | 1,302 L344 US gal286 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,008 LC/year | 2,279 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Buick Envision II Plus 652T
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Tavendor 380TSI
- Has 141 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























