Bugatti W16 Mistral
Car comparison
Bugatti W16 Mistral 8.0vsMercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R232)
AMG SL 43
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bugatti W16 Mistral 8.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.4 s
- Fastest top speed420 km/h261 mph
- Most powerful1,600 hp1,193 kW
- Highest torque1,600 Nm1,180 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight784 hp/t585 kW/t1.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score93/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43
- Lightest1,735 kg3,825 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range737 km458 mi
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,600hp1,193kW | 421hp314kW |
| Torque | 1,600Nm1,180lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,040kg4,497lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,185kg4,817lb |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 38.2s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph Calculated | 65.9s99% target: 275 km/h / 171 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.4s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 5.6s | 15.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.3s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 21.8L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 9.1s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 784hp/t585kW/t356hp/1000 lb Calculated | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 784Nm/t525lb-ft/ton Calculated | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 445km276mi Calculated | 737km458mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 7,993cc488cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,694mm185in | 4,700mm185in |
| Width | 2,034mm80in | 1,915mm75in |
| Height | 1,209mm48in | 1,359mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,711mm107in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,749mm69in | 1,665mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,661mm65in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 125mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 213L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 97L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bugatti W16 Mistral 8.0: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 7,050 rpm | 2,250-7,000 rpm | 7,300 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 6,750 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.3 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.4 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 5.6 s | 15.4 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 12.4 s | - |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.2 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.1 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 7.7 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 9.1 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 274 km/h 171 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 421 hp 314 kW |
Bugatti W16 Mistral 8.0 has 1,179 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43 and Bugatti W16 Mistral 8.0: 1,179 hp (879 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 278 km/h 173 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 2.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bugatti W16 Mistral 8.0 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43: 2.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43 and Bugatti W16 Mistral 8.0: 12.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 784 hp/t 585 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 445 km 276 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 737 km 458 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW | 2.4 s | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 421 hp 314 kW | 4.7 s | 278 km/h 173 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 |
| 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK | 2.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | 784 hp/t 585 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BugattiW16 Mistral8.0 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,600 hp 1,193 kW | 421 hp 314 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,600 Nm 1,180 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.4 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 278 km/h 173 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,040 kg 4,497 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 21.8 L/100 km 10.8 mpg US 13.0 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 445 km 276 mi | 737 km 458 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 213 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 784 hp/t 585 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bugatti W16 Mistral 8.0 | Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 21.8 L/100 km10.8 mpg US13 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 38.15 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 61.40 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,270 L864 US gal719 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,723 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bugatti W16 Mistral 8.0
- Has 1,179 hp more
- Has 1,100 Nm more
- Is 2.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 142 km/h (88 mph) higher top speed
- Has 542 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Uses 12.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 292 km (181 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























