Bugatti EB 112
Car comparison
Bugatti EB 112 6.0 V12vsFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017
Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bugatti EB 112 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed310 km/h193 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful461 hp344 kW
- Highest torque590 Nm435 lb-ft
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best practicality score67/100
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
- Lightest1,764 kg3,889 lb
- Best power-to-weight261 hp/t194 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption16.8 L/100 km14.0 mpg US16.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk408 L
- Best economy score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 461hp344kW | 460hp343kW |
| Torque | 590Nm435lb-ft | 529Nm390lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,764kg3,889lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,114kg4,661lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.8s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 264 km/h / 164 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.3s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK | 16.8L/100 km14mpg US16.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 261hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated | 300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 442km275mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,995cc366cu in | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 5,070mm200in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,960mm77in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,382mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 3,100mm122in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,667mm66in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,656mm65in | 1,646mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | 120mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 365L | 408L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 120L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bugatti EB 112 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 | 6,300 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 7,250 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.3 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 267 km/h 166 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 178 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 | 461 hp 344 kW |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 460 hp 343 kW |
Bugatti EB 112 6.0 V12 has 1 hp more than Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 and Bugatti EB 112 6.0 V12: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 | 590 Nm 435 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 1,764 kg 3,889 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 267 km/h 166 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 | 4.4 s |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bugatti EB 112 6.0 V12 and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 261 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 | 461 hp 344 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | 460 hp 343 kW | 4.8 s | 267 km/h 166 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BugattiEB 1126.0 V12 | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 461 hp 344 kW | 460 hp 343 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 590 Nm 435 lb-ft | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 267 km/h 166 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | 1,764 kg 3,889 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.8 L/100 km 17.0 mpg US 20.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 442 km 275 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 365 L 12.9 cu ft | 408 L 14.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 261 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.8 L/100 km17 mpg US20.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 38.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,070 L547 US gal455 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,623 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bugatti EB 112 6.0 V12
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 61 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 43 km/h (27 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 Mach 1 5.0 Ti-VCT V8
- Is 36 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 43 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























