Spyker C8 Spyder
Car comparison
Spyker C8 Spyder 4.2 V8 40VvsBMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z8 (E52)
4.9
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Spyker C8 Spyder 4.2 V8 40V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed310 km/h193 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Lightest1,000 kg2,205 lb
- Best power-to-weight400 hp/t298 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best practicality score33/100
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best economy score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,000kg2,205lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.0s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated | 59.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.8s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 400hp/t298kW/t181hp/1000 lb Calculated | 241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 480Nm/t321lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 503km313mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,172cc255cu in | 4,941cc302cu in |
| Length | 4,050mm159in | 4,400mm173in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,080mm43in | 1,317mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,400mm55in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 203L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 73L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Spyker C8 Spyder 4.2 V8 40V: Power / Torque
- BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V | 7,500 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 6,600 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.8 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 204 km/h 127 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V | 400 hp 298 kW |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V | 4.5 s |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Spyker C8 Spyder 4.2 V8 40V and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V | 400 hp/t 298 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SpykerC8 Spyder4.2 V8 40V | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,000 kg 2,205 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 503 km 313 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 203 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 400 hp/t 298 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Spyker C8 Spyder 4.2 V8 40V
- Is 660 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 159 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Has 20 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























