Ronart Lightning
Car comparison
Ronart Lightning 4.6 i V8 32VvsBMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z8 (E52)
4.9
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t180 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score68/100
Ronart Lightning 4.6 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph
- Lightest1,400 kg3,086 lb
- Lowest city consumption16.0 L/100 km14.7 mpg US17.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best practicality score35/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 325hp242kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 407Nm300lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,400kg3,086lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 59.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 232hp/t173kW/t105hp/1000 lb Calculated | 241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 503km313mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 4,941cc302cu in |
| Length | 4,470mm176in | 4,400mm173in |
| Width | 1,870mm74in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,195mm47in | 1,317mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,590mm102in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 203L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 73L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ronart Lightning 4.6 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V | 5,800 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 6,600 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 16.3 s |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW |
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 has 75 hp more than Ronart Lightning 4.6 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Ronart Lightning 4.6 i V8 32V and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 75 hp (56 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 and Ronart Lightning 4.6 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V | 325 hp 242 kW | 5.0 s | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RonartLightning4.6 i V8 32V | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 325 hp 242 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 503 km 313 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 203 L 7.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 232 hp/t 173 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ronart Lightning 4.6 i V8 32V
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Has 75 hp more
- Has 93 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























