BMW Z8 (E52)
Car comparison
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9vsMercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLK (A209)
AMG CLK 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.2 L/100 km12.9 mpg US15.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range504 km313 mi
- Largest trunk276 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score44/100
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t180 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best performance score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 367hp274kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 510Nm376lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 70.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 19.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.1L/100 km11.1mpg US13.4mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 210hp/t157kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 292Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 503km313mi Calculated | 504km313mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,941cc302cu in | 5,439cc332cu in |
| Length | 4,400mm173in | 4,638mm183in |
| Width | 1,830mm72in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,317mm52in | 1,405mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,505mm99in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,550mm61in | 1,495mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,474mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 203L | 276L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 390L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 73L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 6,600 rpm | 3,800 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 19.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW |
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 has 33 hp more than Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 33 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 and Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 and BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 503 km 313 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 504 km 313 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 367 hp 274 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ8 (E52)4.9 | Mercedes-BenzCLK (A209)AMG CLK 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 367 hp 274 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 503 km 313 mi | 504 km 313 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 203 L 7.2 cu ft | 276 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9 | Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z8 (E52) 4.9
- Has 33 hp more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz CLK (A209) AMG CLK 55 V8
- Has 10 Nm more
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 km (0 mi) more estimated range
- Has 73 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























