Porsche Boxster (981)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (981) Spyder 3.8vsBMW Z4 (G29) M40i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (G29)
M40i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range703 km437 mi
- Largest trunk281 L
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Porsche Boxster (981) Spyder 3.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful375 hp280 kW
- Lightest1,315 kg2,899 lb
- Best power-to-weight285 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 375hp280kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,315kg2,899lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 57.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 285hp/t213kW/t129hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 319Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 545km339mi Calculated | 703km437mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 2,998cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,414mm174in | 4,324mm170in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,262mm50in | 1,304mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,470mm97in |
| Front track | 1,526mm60in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,589mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 106mm4in | 114mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 281L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 168g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (981) Spyder 3.8: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (G29) M40i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | 6,700 rpm | 4,750-6,000 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.2 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 120 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | 375 hp 280 kW |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 340 hp 254 kW |
Porsche Boxster (981) Spyder 3.8 has 35 hp more than BMW Z4 (G29) M40i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) M40i and Porsche Boxster (981) Spyder 3.8: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | 4.5 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 4.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) M40i and Porsche Boxster (981) Spyder 3.8: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | 285 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | 545 km 339 mi |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 703 km 437 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | 375 hp 280 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 |
| 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | 285 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (981)Spyder 3.8 | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 375 hp 280 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.9 L/100 km 23.8 mpg US 28.5 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 545 km 339 mi | 703 km 437 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 168 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 285 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (981) Spyder 3.8 | BMW Z4 (G29) M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.33 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.88 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,485 L392 US gal327 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,599 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (981) Spyder 3.8
- Has 35 hp more
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
- Has 64 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 157 km (98 mi) more estimated range
- Has 1 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























