Mercedes-Benz SL (R232)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43vsBMW Z4 (G29) M40i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (G29)
M40i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk281 L
- Best economy score87/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Best estimated range745 km463 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381hp284kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,810kg3,990lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 1,860kg4,101lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.8s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 57.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.0s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 210hp/t157kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 745km463mi Calculated | 703km437mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 2,998cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,705mm185in | 4,324mm170in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,359mm54in | 1,304mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,470mm97in |
| Front track | 1,665mm66in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,589mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 114mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 213L | 281L |
| Max trunk volume | 240L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 168g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (G29) M40i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 6,750 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.0 s | 15.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 381 hp 284 kW |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 340 hp 254 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43 has 41 hp more than BMW Z4 (G29) M40i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) M40i and Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 4.9 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 4.5 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43 has more power, BMW Z4 (G29) M40i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) M40i and Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) M40i and Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 745 km 463 mi |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 703 km 437 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 381 hp 284 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | BMWZ4 (G29)M40i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp 284 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,810 kg 3,990 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 745 km 463 mi | 703 km 437 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 168 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 213 L 7.5 cu ft | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43 | BMW Z4 (G29) M40i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 42 km (26 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW Z4 (G29) M40i
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 275 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 68 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























