BMW Z4 (G29)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (G29) 20ivsLotus Elise (SERIES 3) · Facelift 2017 Sport 220 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLotus Elise (SERIES 3) · Facelift 2017
Sport 220 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range754 km468 mi
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Sport 220 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Lightest904 kg1,993 lb
- Best power-to-weight243 hp/t181 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (G29)20i | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197hp147kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 904kg1,993lb |
| Gross weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | - |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 43.7s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 754km468mi Calculated | 533km331mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,324mm170in | 3,824mm151in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,719mm68in |
| Height | 1,304mm51in | 1,117mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,470mm97in | - |
| Front track | 1,609mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,616mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 117mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 281L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 173g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: Power / Torque
- Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Sport 220 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 1,450-4,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 6,800 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (G29)20i | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 197 hp 147 kW |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Sport 220 1.8 has 23 hp more than BMW Z4 (G29) 20i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) 20i and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Sport 220 1.8: 23 hp (17 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 904 kg 1,993 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.8 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Sport 220 1.8 and BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: 2.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) 20i and Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Sport 220 1.8: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 754 km 468 mi |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 533 km 331 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 197 hp 147 kW | 6.8 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 220 hp 164 kW | 4.6 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Sport 220 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (G29)20i | LotusElise (SERIES 3)Facelift 2017Sport 220 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp 147 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 904 kg 1,993 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 754 km 468 mi | 533 km 331 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 173 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (G29) 20i | Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Sport 220 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 220 km (137 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Lotus Elise (SERIES 3) Facelift 2017 Sport 220 1.8
- Has 23 hp more
- Is 516 kg lighter
- Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 105 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























