Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 CDIvsBMW Z4 (G29) 20i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (G29)
20i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 CDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,200 km746 mi
- Best overall score49/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score93/100
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i
- Lightest1,430 kg3,153 lb
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk281 L
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | 1,885kg4,156lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.3s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 77.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.3s Calculated | 26.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 334Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,200km746mi Calculated | 867km539mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 4,324mm170in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,304mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,470mm97in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,609mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 117mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 281L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 52L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 CDI: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 1,450-4,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.3 s | 26.3 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 197 hp 147 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 CDI has 7 hp more than BMW Z4 (G29) 20i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) 20i and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 CDI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 6.5 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 CDI and BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 CDI and BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 1,200 km 746 mi |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 867 km 539 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.5 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 197 hp 147 kW | 6.6 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 CDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 CDI | BMWZ4 (G29)20i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,200 km 746 mi | 867 km 539 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 CDI | BMW Z4 (G29) 20i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 CDI
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 333 km (207 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 56 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























