Wiesmann Roadster MF4
Car comparison
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8vsBMW Z4 (E89) 35is
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E89)
35is
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 35is
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions210 g/km
- Best estimated range611 km380 mi
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed293 km/h182 mph
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight302 hp/t225 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | BMWZ4 (E89)35is |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420hp313kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,600kg3,527lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.1s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.0s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 302hp/t225kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated | 213hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 281Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | 611km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,999cc244cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,230mm167in | 4,244mm167in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,190mm47in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,507mm99in | 2,496mm98in |
| Front track | - | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | - | 1,537mm61in |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 275g/km | 210g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E89) 35is: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | 5,900 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | BMWZ4 (E89)35is |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.0 s | 16.0 s |
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 181 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | 340 hp 254 kW |
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8 has 80 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 35is.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35is and Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8: 80 hp (60 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 4.4 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8 and BMW Z4 (E89) 35is: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35is and Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 302 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | 213 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 574 km 357 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | 611 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.4 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E89) 35is is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | 302 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35is | 213 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | WiesmannRoadster MF4S 4.0 V8 | BMWZ4 (E89)35is | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp 313 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | 611 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 275 g/km | 210 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 302 hp/t 225 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 213 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8 | BMW Z4 (E89) 35is |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km | 15.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year | 2,363 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Wiesmann Roadster MF4 S 4.0 V8
- Has 80 hp more
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 90 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW Z4 (E89) 35is
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 65 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























