Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (987) · Facelift 2009 S 3.4vsBMW Z4 (E89) 35i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E89)
35i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions219 g/km
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Fastest top speed274 km/h170 mph
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Lightest1,355 kg2,987 lb
- Best power-to-weight229 hp/t171 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Best estimated range663 km412 mi
- Best performance score68/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,355kg2,987lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Top speed | 274 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 271 km/h / 169 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.4s | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 229hp/t171kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 194hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 663km412mi Calculated | 585km364mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,436cc210cu in | 2,979cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,342mm171in | 4,239mm167in |
| Width | 1,801mm71in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,291mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,496mm98in |
| Front track | 1,486mm59in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,528mm60in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 123mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 130L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 230g/km | 219g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 7,200 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5,800 rpm | 1,300-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.4 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | 274 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 has 4 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 274 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 5.3 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5.2 s |
Although Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 has more power, BMW Z4 (E89) 35i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 663 km 412 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 585 km 364 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.3 s | 274 km/h 170 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (987)Facelift 2009S 3.4 | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 274 km/h 170 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,355 kg 2,987 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 663 km 412 mi | 585 km 364 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 230 g/km | 219 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 130 L 4.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4 | BMW Z4 (E89) 35i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (987) Facelift 2009 S 3.4
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 78 km (49 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























