BMW Z4 (E89)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E89) 35ivsNissan 370Z Roadster 3.7 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan 370Z Roadster
3.7 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Nissan 370Z Roadster 3.7 V6
- Most powerful328 hp245 kW
- Lightest1,524 kg3,360 lb
- Best power-to-weight215 hp/t160 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best estimated range643 km399 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 328hp245kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 363Nm268lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,580kg3,483lb | 1,524kg3,360lb |
| Gross weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,885kg4,156lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.6s Calculated | 18.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 194hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t160kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 585km364mi Calculated | 643km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 3,696cc226cu in |
| Length | 4,239mm167in | 4,250mm167in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,845mm73in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,325mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,496mm98in | 2,550mm100in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,595mm63in |
| Trunk volume | - | 140L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 72L |
| CO2 emissions | 219g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E89) 35i: Power / Torque
- Nissan 370Z Roadster 3.7 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5,800 rpm | 1,300-5,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | 7,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.6 s | 18.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 173 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | 328 hp 245 kW |
Nissan 370Z Roadster 3.7 V6 has 22 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 35i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and Nissan 370Z Roadster 3.7 V6: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | 1,524 kg 3,360 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 5.2 s |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | 5.5 s |
Although Nissan 370Z Roadster 3.7 V6 has more power, BMW Z4 (E89) 35i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and Nissan 370Z Roadster 3.7 V6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 35i and Nissan 370Z Roadster 3.7 V6: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 585 km 364 mi |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | 643 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | 328 hp 245 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)35i | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E89)35i | Nissan370Z Roadster3.7 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 328 hp 245 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | 1,524 kg 3,360 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 585 km 364 mi | 643 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 219 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 194 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E89) 35i | Nissan 370Z Roadster 3.7 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E89) 35i
- Has 37 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Nissan 370Z Roadster 3.7 V6
- Has 22 hp more
- Is 56 kg lighter
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























